NE1727: Influence of ovary, uterus, and embryo on pregnancy success in ruminants

(Multistate Research Project)

Status: Inactive/Terminating

NE1727: Influence of ovary, uterus, and embryo on pregnancy success in ruminants

Duration: 10/01/2017 to 09/30/2022

Administrative Advisor(s):

NIFA Reps:

Non-Technical Summary

Statement of Issues and Justification

The need as indicated by stakeholders. Impaired reproductive performance is a major cause of reduced productivity for ruminants and of reduced profitability for dairy and meat animal producers. The focus of the NE1227 Multistate Project, and its predecessors, NE1027, NE1007, NE161, NE72, NE 41 and NE 1, has been to address nutritional, management and environmental factors that impact ovarian, oviductal, and uterine function, as well as embryo quality, which collectively impact pregnancy rates in domestic ruminants. The long-term goal of the project is to understand how altered ovarian function, impaired oocyte quality, and disruptions of conceptus-uterine interactions contribute to infertility, and devise management strategies that will overcome these factors in order to optimize the chances that animals successfully achieve a pregnancy.  The current proposal will continue this important investigative work, focusing on basic mechanisms that impair or contribute to optimal follicular development, corpus luteum function, oocyte quality, preimplantation embryo development, and uterine-conceptus interactions. Additionally, the feasibility of innovative management practices will be investigated, with development of new strategies based on findings from the basic and applied research. Attaining these goals will positively impact animal producers and the scientific community, as well as indirectly affecting citizens of the region and the nation by promoting sustainable agricultural systems.

The objectives of this proposal align with Strategic Goal 1: Science in the NIFA Strategic Plan (2014-2018). Specifically, they are designed to meet the first sub-goal of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, which “addresses human interaction between science, technology, and agriculture and integrates the biological, physical, and environmental and socioeconomic factors essential to successful production enterprises and viable rural communities”. The success of the project will be measured in part according to NIFA-defined performance measures including (1) Measure 1.1.4 -number of peer-reviewed journal articles, lay publications, patents, and educational activities that increase understanding of biological processes and development of diagnostic techniques; (2) Measure 1.1.10 –behavior change related to factors affecting the decision making process, such as availability of resources and external forces; (3) Measure 1.7.4 –number of college graduates prepared for the professional and technical workforce in the food and agricultural industry; and (4) Measure 1.7.5 –number of graduate students and post-doctorates engaged in NIFA-administered projects and programs with an integrated education component to improve educational opportunities in agriculture.

Importance of work and consequences if it is not done. Improving fertility in ruminants requires fundamental knowledge about internal (e.g. immune cells) and external (e.g. toxins and nutrition) influences on (1) follicle activation, oocyte growth, and oocyte maturation; (2) corpus luteum development, steroidogenesis, and regression; (3) fertilization and preimplantation embryonic development; and (4) conceptus-uterine-ovarian interactions. It is critical to identify the underlying causes of anovulation, fertilization failure, luteal insufficiency, and early embryonic loss in ruminants, which are the leading causes of bovine infertility. By enhancing basic knowledge of the underlying biology surrounding ovarian function and embryonic development, new strategies can be developed for application by producers, veterinarians, and farm consultants. For example, as part of the basic research on follicular development and regulation of corpus luteum function, new reproductive management strategies for first artificial insemination (AI) and rebreeding strategies were developed (Double Ovsynch, optimized voluntary waiting period, extra treatment with prostaglandin F2a during protocols, etc.) and are now in practical use on commercial dairy farms. Studies continue to develop and evaluate management approaches that use already FDA-approved products and novel products in order to provide management strategies that are economical, user- and consumer-friendly, and preserve food quality and safety. Novel nonhormonal strategies, such as supplementation with specific feed additives, have been tested and validated in order to improve reproductive efficiency, reduce pregnancy loss, and improve reproductive health of the animal.

The technical feasibility of the work. The technical members of NE-1227 (molecular biologists, cell physiologists, and animal scientists) are a diverse group of scientists with broad and complementary expertise in ovarian and uterine physiology, oocyte and embryo development, and reproductive management of domestic ruminants. Recent additions of members with expertise in ovarian reserve and activation of follicle growth, preimplantation development of embryos, and maternal recognition of pregnancy will fill important gaps in knowledge in order to more effectively understand factors that cause early embryonic loss in the dairy cow. Previous individual and collaborative productivity of the members are indicative of ability to successfully perform, interpret, and disseminate the specific experiments outlined in the proposal. The diverse nature of the scientists in this project has been one of its strengths, allowing for integration of knowledge to achieve productive management outcomes.

The advantages for doing the work as a multistate effort. Advantages of performing this work as a multistate effort include complementary approaches with collaborative efforts, and technologies that can be integrated and directed toward several objectives simultaneously. The shared experience and data analyses contributed by individuals within the technical group make these interactions more beneficial. Moreover, the combination of basic biological research with innovative applied research more effectively supports outreach programs and engagement, the goal of which is to improve reproductive performance in livestock more rapidly. Using this paradigm, this multistate group has historically been one of the most productive, cohesive, diverse and collaborative multistate research groups nationwide. The commitment of participants to the multistate project is exemplified by numerous collaborative publications, including one in which it was decided to list the project itself as the author, rather than individuals (J. Anim. Sci. 74:1943-1952 [1]). Additionally, members at different stations have contributed to unified animal and cell culture protocols, conducted collaborative experiments, and exchanged samples to take advantage of unique validated procedures and will continue to do so in this project.

Impacts from successfully completing the work. Fulfilling the objectives of this project will provide important new information in order to combat declining fertility among ruminants, and especially dairy cows, in the face of continuous improvement in milk production capability. In the previous project (i.e. NE-1227), proposed research projects were performed using intramural and extramural competitive grant funds garnered by the members (more than $3.6 million). The 15 technical members of NE-1227 published refereed research papers (196), abstracts and conference papers (117), theses and dissertations (27), book chapters and invited reviews (17), technical/extension publications (13), and deposited sequences into the Gene Expression Omnibus (5). In addition, workshops and lectures (13) were presented to producers, veterinarians, and consultants locally and internationally. Based on these outputs, research colleagues investigating reproduction in ruminants around the world developed collaborations and benefited from this multitude of scientific reports and publications.

In addition, veterinarians, consultants, pharmaceutical companies, and breeding organizations who service the agricultural animal industries have been immediate beneficiaries of the work from this project. For example, collaborators have presented annual reports on the project to Select Sires and Genex CRI (Cattle AI organization) and reports at the National Association of Animal Breeders (NAAB). In turn, those groups spread the technology to farm families/producers for implementation, which benefits the on-farm profitability and sustains agricultural production systems that are highly competitive in the global economy.

Student training is another important impact of this project. During the last project period, the 15 technical members submitted more than 80 abstracts to national or international meetings with the bulk of these abstracts presented by graduate students in poster or platform sessions. Furthermore, 37 students completed or are currently pursuing a M.S. or PhD. degree. In addition to graduate students, numerous undergraduate students (98) with an interest in reproductive physiology were introduced to investigative research. These activities represent an important contribution of the project to the education of the next generation of scientists, consultants, and other workers in animal agriculture industries.

Related, Current and Previous Work


This has been an extraordinarily productive period for this regional research project. The group has published almost 200 (196) peer-reviewed scientific publications ranging from very basic reproductive biology to extremely practical reproductive management strategies that are already being applied on dairy farms. These publications appear in some of the top biological and agricultural journals and represent some of the foremost scientific manuscripts from each of the experiment stations represented on this project. Critical and straightforward discussion of the science and practical application of the latest reproductive research has been the hallmark of this project from its inception as NE-1, and has continued to drive the research excellence during the most recent project period. Some of the important accomplishments during this period are highlighted.

Follicular and Oocyte Function:

  1. Factors have been defined for the establishment of the primordial follicle pool and for activation of the primordial follicle. Specifically, studies using fetal bovine ovaries strengthened the evidence for estradiol and progesterone (P4) as regulators of follicle formation and capacity to activate and showed that: A) effects of steroids are mediated by nuclear steroid receptors, B) LH, FSH, and estradiol regulate fetal steroidogenesis, C) bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 4, but not BMP7, promotes follicle activation, D) activin A stimulates follicle formation and activation and regulates fetal ovarian steroid production, and E) the endocrine disruptors BPA and genistein exert differential effects on follicle formation and activation and on steroidogenesis.  
  2. Oocyte developmental potential is acutely dependent on sufficient zinc during antral follicular development. Severe fertility problems occurred in females with inadequate zinc.
  3. The ovulatory transition involves changes in the Hippo signaling pathway that may be a key regulator of cumulus cell differentiation.
  4. Experiments to study a potential role of sonic hedgehog as a maternal effect gene in the oocyte showed that in contrast to rodents, sonic hedgehog is not expressed in the bovine oocyte.  In related work, a cell fate mapping approach was used to identify the cell type within the follicle that is the target of signaling by Indian and desert hedgehog proteins secreted by granulosa cells.
  5. Paraoxonase 1 is a negative acute phase protein with antioxidant and antiinflammatory activities and in ovarian follicular fluid of cows it may protect oocytes from local metabolic/oxidative damage.
  6. Unlike mouse oocytes, bovine oocytes possess a functional Store Operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) Ca2+ influx system to refill internal Ca2+ stores required for initiation of Ca2+ oscillations and oocyte activation.
  7. A novel oocyte-specific nuclear transporter, KPNA7, was discovered and a number of oocyte specific maternal effect genes, including NOBOX, FIGLA and LHX8 were characterized.
  8. The mechanism of CCN1 action on granulosa cells is, in part, mediated by the protein kinase C signaling pathway.
  9. A serum-free, bovine granulosa cell (bGC) culture system to study cell growth, differentiation, and sensitivity to cytokine-induced death was developed and used to better understand function of granulosa cells from bovine small follicles (<5mm).
  10. Impairment of keratin intermediate filaments within granulosa cells augments surface expression of Fas and Fas-mediated apoptosis.
  11. Identified a novel correlation between the microbial ecology of the gut and ovarian inflammation and oocyte transcript abundance.
  12. Identified a novel genotype that results in high ovulation rate in cattle. Determined hormonal and follicular growth dynamics and molecular mechanisms that underlie the high ovulation rate.

Corpus Luteum, Oviduct, Uterus, and Pregnancy:

  1. Determined the rate of pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows during the period of maternal recognition using a combination of interferon-stimulated gene expression and pregnancy specific protein B concentrations to confirm the presence of an embryo.
  2. Delineated how fibroblast growth factors influence oocyte competency and early embryonic development in cattle. These findings have also been used to develop a ‘cocktail’ of growth factors that promote extraembryonic membrane development in cattle. More recent efforts have identified a new embryo-derived factor that regulates early embryogenesis in cattle.
  3. Determined that early plane of nutrition impacts the progression of uterine gland development in heifers, and that this outcome may be mediated by changes in the expression of several local controllers of gland development. These outcomes will help us to better understand how modifications in early management of calves may impact subsequent reproductive potential.  
  4. Discovered that the types of T lymphocytes present in the CL depend on the functional status of the CL, and that bovine luteal cells can program T lymphocytes to facilitate luteal function.
  5. Evaluated the role of microRNA in a number of different tissues. Discovered that they are involved in major transitional states in the CL, such as the shift from growth to maintenance, and the determination of regression or rescue by an embryo.
  6. Determined transcriptomic changes in the uterus and peripheral blood during early pregnancy.
  7. Discovered a role for preovulatory estradiol concentrations in conceptus development, uterine gene expression, and subsequent pregnancy loss after AI or embryo transfer.
  8. Evaluated the role of CCN1 in the folliculo-luteal transition and in the development and maintenance of the bovine CL.
  9. Determined the transcriptomic changes induced by ovarian steroids in oviductal function. Microarray-based transcriptional profiling demonstrated that oviductal epithelial cells had 1563 (ampulla) and 1758 (isthmus) transcripts that differed and the complete dataset was deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (National Center for Biotechnology Information, as accession number GSE63969.
  10. Evaluated the role of sperm proteins in bovine early embryonic development.

Improving Reproductive Efficiency in Dairy Cattle:

  1. Determined the presence of a growth hormone receptor (GHR) AluI(-) allele in Holstein cows that is associated with increased serum IGF-I concentrations and a shorter calving to conception interval during lactation, and indicator of better fertility.
  2. A collaboration has been established among 4 stations in the regional research project with a database of DNA and phenotypic data on fertility that includes 464 cows (to date) for genotyping polymorphisms in candidate genes eg. GHR and IGF-I and comparing with fertility.
  3. Determined the impact of pregnancy loss during the period of maternal recognition of pregnancy on luteal function and follicular wave dynamics in lactating dairy cows.
  4. Determined specific factors that lower fertility in lactating dairy cows such as: larger uterine size, greater body condition score loss, lack of complete luteal regression, excessive energy content of diet, insufficient P4 before or after AI, and insufficient magnitude of the GnRH-induced LH surge.
  5. Developed strategies to improve fertility by increasing circulating P4 concentrations before AI (Double Ovsynch), reducing P4 concentrations near AI (second prostaglandin treatment), and increasing P4 after AI (Day 5 hCG or GnRH treatment).



As evidenced by our previous accomplishments, the individual and collaborative projects of this group have focused on improving fertility in ruminants with an emphasis on dairy cow fertility. Fundamental investigations have been performed of physiologic, cellular, and molecular processes that control ovarian function and establishment of pregnancy in cattle. Further, practical studies have been performed showing that anovulation, decreased insemination efficiency, and early embryonic mortality are the leading causes of open and culled cows in the dairy and beef cattle herds in the United States and that practical solutions are available to improve reproductive management and fertility, providing the potential for billions of dollars in economic benefit for dairy and beef cattle producers [2-4]. Ovarian input into successful embryonic development includes the intraovarian environment associated with follicle and oocyte growth, function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis required for ovulation and oocyte maturation, and development and maintenance of an optimally-functioning corpus luteum. Thus, the overall long-term objective of the group is to use our collective expertise to understand the mechanisms by which internal and external forces modify these important physiological processes and to use this information about core biological processes to rationally develop new and innovative tools to increase cyclicity and breeding efficiency, and reduce early embryonic failures, thereby improving reproductive efficiency of both dairy and beef cattle operations in the United States.

Ovarian Influence on Pregnancy Success: It is well recognized that gamete quality, and in particular oocyte quality, is an important determinant of successful embryo development [5-7]. Indeed, infertility and poor embryo development ensues when oocyte maturation is compromised. The oocyte develops within the context of the ovarian follicle where it is in intimate contact with the surrounding granulosa cells. In fact, the oocyte and granulosa form a bidirectional regulatory loop that ensures adequate expression of factors that sustain growth and development and/or inhibit atresia of the follicle in collaboration with endocrine follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [8-10]. Regulation of ovarian follicle growth is a dynamic process during which cohorts of follicles are recruited and grow in successive waves throughout the estrous cycle of the dairy cow [11-13]. Recruitment of each new wave is preceded and triggered by a transient rise in circulating FSH concentrations [14-19]. During each period of recruitment only a single antral follicle is selected to become dominant over the remaining subordinate follicles of the cohort. The dominant follicle then has one of two fates: attain preovulatory status and eventually ovulate, or be eliminated with the cohort of subordinate follicles through follicular atresia. Dynamic changes in circulating hormones, paracrine factors acting within the follicle, and intracellular signaling pathways are involved in follicular growth and selection of an ovulatory follicle. In addition, local interactions and paracrine and endocrine factors play an important role in the development of a high-quality oocyte competent for fertilization and preimplantation development.

The preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) causes dramatic changes in the dominant follicle and in the granulosa cells during ovulation. The LH surge is also a stimulus for maturation of the cytoplasmic contents of the oocyte including accumulation and redistribution of organelles, accumulation of essential nutrients, and selective storage and degradation of RNAs and proteins [20, 21]. These changes ultimately lead to the release of the cumulus-oocyte complex into the oviduct and transformation of the ruptured follicle into the corpus luteum, which produces large amounts of P4 [22]. The cumulus cells undergo a process called cumulus expansion, which involves the production of a protein matrix that envelops the cumulus cells and oocyte, and also secrete significant amounts of P4 that may aid in guiding sperm to the expanded complex [23, 24]. Thus, cumulus expansion and luteinization of the ruptured follicle are two key features of terminal differentiation in granulosa cells. In addition, the LH surge stimulates the oocyte to resume meiosis and results in an oocyte terminated at metaphase II [20, 25].

During all of these processes, vascular development is critical, beginning as the activated primary follicle progresses to the secondary stage and continuing as the follicle increases in size and complexity [26-28]. Vascular development proceeds through the process of angiogenesis and is restricted to the region of mesenchymal cells immediately outside the basement membrane that surrounds the granulosa layer of the early follicle. This region eventually becomes the vascularized theca cell layer while the granulosa layer remains avascular. Angiogenesis involves proliferation of endothelial cells to cause expansion of the existing vascular network and maturation of the capillary plexus by association of vessels with mural support cells (pericytes and vascular smooth muscle). A functional vascular network of arterioles, capillaries and venules is established by remodeling [29]. Just prior to ovulation, the basement membrane of the follicle breaks down and there is ingrowth of thecal vessels into the granulosa layer. This initiates the dramatic increase in angiogenesis that contributes to formation of the corpus luteum, one of the most well-vascularized tissues in the body [28]. While a number of proteins or angiogenic regulators critical for vascular development in the follicle and corpus luteum have been identified, the precise interactions among cell types and the signals that coordinate vascular development with development of the follicle and corpus luteum have not been adequately described

Factors that Impair Oocyte Quality and Promote Follicular Atresia: Multiple extrinsic and intrinsic stresses including heat stress (HS) and metabolic dysfunction, cause anovulation, decrease conception rates and compromise the ability to maintain pregnancy in agriculturally important animals. Reproductive dysfunction due to thermal stress is an enormous economic burden and represents a worldwide food security issue. Globally, HS is the primary factor limiting efficient animal protein production for human consumption, and the deleterious effects of HS on reproduction are difficult to mitigate because information on the causative mechanism(s) is scant. Additionally, as climate change continues, seasonal infertility will likely become even more of an economic burden and animal welfare issue in the future. Likewise, metabolic disturbances due to negative energy balance associated with increased milk yield have contributed to decreased fertility in the dairy cow [30]. It is clear from the existing epidemiological data and multiple mouse models, that metabolic dysfunction reduces oocyte quality [31-33]. Indeed, obesity-related metabolic dysfunction has been correlated to mitochondrial dysfunction [31, 34], endoplasmic reticulum stress [35, 36], and increased abundance of oocyte mRNA [33, 37]. Recent studies by our group have demonstrated altered concentrations of circulating NEFA and sex-hormone binding globulin (a liver-expressed protein) and expression of metabolic-related genes in theca cells of beef cows that are sporadically or chronically anovulatory, suggesting that metabolic dysfunction may alter ovarian follicular growth and oocyte quality in beef and dairy cows. What is not clear are the mechanistic links between these external stressors and abnormalities in follicular growth and oocyte quality. Understanding these mechanisms is important in order to circumvent this growing problem

Contribution of the Corpus Luteum to Reproductive Success: P4 is the key hormone released by the CL and is essential for maintenance of pregnancy in all mammals, including ruminants. Circulating P4 concentrations represent a balance between production of P4 by the large and small luteal cells and metabolism of P4, primarily by the liver. In cattle, optimized fertility has been shown to occur when circulating P4 is high before the breeding period [38-40], low near the time of breeding [41-44], and high during luteal development after breeding [45, 46]. Researchers in this regional project have been involved in numerous studies of luteal physiology, including: development of the CL, angiogenesis and blood flow in the CL, luteal steroidogenesis, immune function in the CL, and luteolysis.

A related process, critical for fertility, involves maintenance of the CL in a pregnant animal. The first critical period for luteal maintenance encompasses the time of normal luteolysis or “maternal recognition of pregnancy” that occurs from Days 16 to 25 in cattle [47-51]. During this decisive period, the embryo is dramatically increasing in size through the process of embryo elongation and the CL is maintained in cows with a “healthy” elongation. Alternatively, inadequate communication between the embryo, uterus, and ovary produces failure of luteal maintenance [52] and redirection of the physiology toward luteolysis coincident with a decline in circulating P4, resulting in loss of the conceptus. Interferon-tau action is integral to all three of the critical processes that occur during this pivotal period of pregnancy: elongation, maintenance of the CL, and immunological protection of the embryo. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms involved in these processes, particularly rescue of the CL, are still not completely defined and will be investigated.

Another pivotal period for pregnancy loss or maintenance occurs during the second month of pregnancy (Days 28 to 60). In this period about 12% of pregnancies are lost [53]. Some of the key problems leading to loss of pregnancy include: luteal regression [53], inadequate placentation [54, 55], difficulty in the transition from amniotic to allantoic nutrition [56, 57], alterations in vascularization of the placenta and other systems [58, 59], and underdevelopment of the embryo/fetus [60]. Some of the most dramatic and well-described deficiencies in development during this period occur in embryos that are produced by in vitro fertilization [58, 60] or nuclear transfer [54-57]. The current project proposes to better understand this period in order to reduce pregnancy loss in ruminants.

Uterine Factors that Influence Embryo Survival: Another area of interest is to understand how uterine factors contribute to early embryonic development. The niche for early embryo development remains one of the most fundamental and promising frontiers yet to be completely characterized. In particular, the extended ruminant preimplantation period, (days 4-5 to days 20-21 after fertilization), represents an understudied yet critical phase of pregnancy during which successful early embryonic growth and elongation is completely dependent upon the different components that are contained within the uterine fluid (UF) or “histotroph” [61, 62]. Early attempts to characterize the uterine environment have mostly focused on discovering salts and protein composition [63-69] to uncover buffering and immunomodulatory elements in the UF. Recent studies have utilized mass spectrometry for identifying the different protein components in LUF [70-73]. However, the complete metabolic profile of the UF that would determine energy availability and homeostasis for the early preimplantation embryo is unknown. Secretion of energy substrates such as glucose, lactate and pyruvate is highly regulated by responses of the uterine epithelium [74, 75]. In addition, ruminant metabolism offers unique distinctions in substrate availability and utilization, presenting a system that cannot be extrapolated from other species. Moreover, metabolic stress during high milk production could also be an important consideration for metabolite changes in UF that may contribute to early embryonic mortality. Therefore, knowledge of the content of different metabolic substrates and metabolites in the bovine UF could be important for fertility management. At the crossroads of reproduction and nutrition, new understanding of metabolism in the UF might also allow for nutritional intervention to improve embryo survival in dairy cows.

Finally, it is clear that the early embryo alters the proportions and function of uterine resident immune cells. In other species these changes have been shown to be essential for establishment of pregnancy and to support development of an optimal placenta. Relatively little is known about the changes in uterine immune cells and immune mediating molecules during early pregnancy [76, 77]. However, it is clear that diseases, including subclinical disease, can reduce fertility in dairy cattle [78, 79]. Furthermore, a portion of the nearly 50% reduction in conception rates between heifers and mature lactating dairy cattle may be due to immune dysregulation at the fetal-maternal interface. A focus of this project will be to define the changes in immune cell proportions and expression of immune mediators during early pregnancy and to compare these changes between fertile heifers and subfertile, lactating dairy cows.

Genetic Determinants of Fertility in Dairy Cows: New techniques in molecular genetics and genomics are offering extraordinary possibilities for selection of high fertility dairy cattle and identification of the key genes/processes involved in optimized fertility [80, 81]. Reduced genetic merit for fertility has been linked with unfavorable metabolic status, delayed resumption of postpartum ovulation, and inadequate luteal phase P4 concentrations [82-84]. In addition, reproductive traits have been linked with specific genotypes of tumor necrosis factor α [85], leptin promoter [86], IGF-I [87], and growth hormone receptor [88-90]. Genetic and genomic studies provide unique opportunities for selection of higher fertility dairy cattle and to unravel physiological mechanisms related to genotypes and fertility among high producing dairy cows.

Current Reproductive Management Programs Used with Dairy Cows: Reproductive management programs, including synchronization of ovulation protocols for timed artificial insemination (TAI), are widely used by dairy farms [91, 92]. These protocols can be used to maximize fertility of AI services or to ensure timely insemination of cows that, due to biological or management factors, are not detected in estrus [93-97]. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the reproductive biology of dairy cattle through some of the work conducted by the experimental stations involved in this regional project NE-1227 [95, 98-102] and work conducted by others, the physiological response to synchronization of ovulation protocols remains suboptimal. Ovulatory failure in response to GnRH treatments [96, 98, 103, 104], lack of luteal regression in response to PGF treatments [96, 98, 100, 105], and an inadequate hormonal environment during growth and maturation of the ovulatory follicle [46], contribute to the suboptimal fertility of lactating dairy cows that receive TAI. These issues are exacerbated in previously inseminated cows due to the effect of pregnancy loss on the ovarian function of cows [101]. Therefore, in order to continue improving the fertility of AI services in lactating dairy cows, it is paramount to develop novel treatments that optimize the response to synchronization of ovulation protocols.

Lack of obvious behavioral estrus (which signals that the animal is in the ovulatory stage of the estrous cycle) will impact producer’s insemination decisions, and increase costs associated with increased feeding requirements of presumed inseminated females. Not surprisingly, both HS [106, 107] and LPS [108] impact female estrous behavior and frequency. As in the case of the LH surge, a threshold of E2 is needed to induce behavioral display of estrus, however the amount required for the latter is thought to be at a lower level [109]. Altered E2 by HS and LPS may explain the observed impacts on behavioral estrus because E2 is required for both of these female phenotypic responses.

Another critical aspect of reproductive management programs for dairy cows is nonpregnancy diagnosis, because earlier identification of nonpregnant animals allows immediate reinsemination. A short interbreeding interval for previously inseminated cows is key to reduction of time to pregnancy and to maximize herd profitability [110]. Although traditional pregnancy testing methods (i.e., rectal palpation and transrectal ultrasonography) help to reduce the interbreeding interval when implemented in conjunction with a synchronization of ovulation protocol, monitoring markers of pregnancy in blood or milk may allow earlier identification and rebreeding of nonpregnant cows. For example, expression of interferon stimulated genes (ISG) in white blood cells [101, 111-113] and circulating concentrations of Pregnancy Associated Glycoproteins (PAG) [101, 114-116] allow for identification of nonpregnant cows as early as the third to fourth week after AI. Because these markers may also have value as predictors of the fate of pregnancy they could be used for early identification of cows that will lose their pregnancy [117]. Therefore, research efforts at the NY, PA, VA, and WI experimental stations will also focus on the development of strategies that integrate these early markers of pregnancy into reproductive strategies for second and greater AI service. In addition, understanding and improving Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) such as embryo transfer, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and cloning provide opportunities for understanding key aspects of reproduction and improving reproductive efficiency.


A search of the CRIS system was conducted using the following key words: follicular growth, oocyte quality, early embryonic death, corpus luteum function, uterine receptivity, timed artificial insemination, and ruminants. There are 3 current multistate projects studying reproductive performance in domestic livestock. W3171 – Germ Cell and Embryo Development and Manipulation for the Improvement of Livestock aims to understand the biology and mechanisms of gamete development, fertilization, and embryogenesis with an emphasis on production of genetically enhanced animals for livestock production. The main impetus of NC1201 – Methods to Increase Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle is to develop breeding programs and estrous synchronization protocols to increase the efficiency and predictability of sustainable reproductive management programs for cattle. Finally, W3112 – Reproductive Performance in Domestic Ruminants studies the endocrine regulation of reproductive behavior, estrous cyclicity, gamete development, follicular recruitment, ovulation, luteal function, and immune-dependent embryonic loss in order to develop biotechnologies to improve reproductive efficiency in domestic ruminants. It is our view that our proposal complements these other projects with our long-term goal of improving female fertility of ruminants. However, our project will examine novel pathways and mechanisms regulating ovarian function, uterine-embryo cross-talk, and the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy with an emphasis on dairy cattle.


  1. Determine the Impact of Altered Ovarian Function on Ruminant Reproductive Performance (IA, KY, MS, NE, NH, NY, PA, VA, VT, WI , WV)
  2. Identify Alterations in Embryo Development and Uterine and CL Function Associated with Declining Pregnancy Establishment in Ruminants – (NY, PA, VA, WI)
  3. Identify Changes in Genetics and Reproductive Management that Lead to Improved Pregnancy Rates in Ruminants


Comprehensive methods section has been provided in the attachment entitled "NE_TEMP1227 Full Methods.pdf."  Summarized information below.

Objective 1: Growth of the oocyte within the follicular microenvironment, oocyte maturation and ovulation, and the development of a functional corpus luteum (CL) are critical determinants of reproductive success. These collective processes are regulated by a myriad of signaling pathways; however, there remains gaps in understanding the precise mechanisms of action by the signaling pathways or how they are regulated. Furthermore, there are gaps in understanding how negative environmental conditions impinge on these pathways to interfere with follicle growth, oocyte quality and/or luteal function.

  1. Determine if Hippo signaling is activated during ovulation to promote GC differentiation. The hypothesis is that Hippo signaling acts as a switch in GCs during ovulation. Primary GC cultures under control or luteinizing conditions will be employed and activation of the Hippo pathway determined by Western blot to detect phosphorylation of the target proteins, YAP and TAZ. Cellular proliferation will be determined using an MTT-based assay and cellular differentiation will analyzed by upregulation of the P4 biosynthetic pathway using real-time PCR, western blot or measurement of P4 accumulation in the media of cultured cells.
  2. Identify signaling pathways that regulate Hippo signaling during ovulation. The hypothesis that activation of the PKA and/or MAPK3/1 pathways induces Hippo pathway activation in GCs will be tested, since ovulatory signals detected in GCs due to LH receptor activation involves signaling directly or indirectly through PKA and MAPK pathways. To determine which pathway(s) regulate hippo signaling during ovulation, luteinizing GCs will be cultured with or without specific PKA or MAPK3/1 inhibitors and the status of Hippo pathway activation will be determined by qPCR of Hippo target transcripts and Western blot for pYAP and pTAZ.
  3. Determine if ERK signaling enhances GC resistance to apoptosis and follicular atresia. The hypothesis is that activation of the MAPK3/1 pathway induces ERK signaling and GC resistance to FAS-mediated apoptosis will be tested. Genetic manipulation of ERK signaling will be performed to gain insight about ERK signaling roles in immune-mediated apoptosis of GCs and growth selection of bovine follicles; primary cultures of bovine antral follicle GCs will be utilized and several qualitative (immunoblot analysis, confocal microscopy) and quantitative (qPCR, cell death assays) measures of ERK expression and apoptosis assessed. Genetic manipulation of GCs will be implemented to augment/inhibit ERK expression and determine the effects on FAS-mediated apoptosis.
  4. Investigate whether hedgehog (HH) signaling plays a role in directing follicle development. We hypothesize that HH signaling regulates the development of vasculature in growing ovarian follicles and CLs. Cortical tissue will be cultured to assess follicle development to primary and secondary stages and associated development of vasculature. HH signaling will be stimulated or inhibited in cultured tissue and effects on follicular and vascular morphology and gene and protein expression patterns associated with vascularization will be determined using qPCR and immunohistochemistry. Cultures of dispersed theca and early luteal cells, containing mixtures of steroidogenic and vascular cells, will be used to examine the development of vascular tubes and the interactions among vascular cell types in response to manipulation of HH signaling.
  5. Determine mechanistic regulation of CCN1 expression in GCs during transition to luteal cells. We have previously characterized the regulation of CCN1 mRNA expression by steroid hormones, gonadotropins and prostaglandins in human GC lines (KGN, HGrC1)[209, 210]. Regulation of CCN1 by these same factors in bovine GCs from midcycle cows will be measured by qPCR. Conditioned media will be analyzed for steroid hormones (E2 and P4) and for matrix metalloproteinases by gelatin zymography. Regulation of downstream PGF signaling factors (ERK, RAF, RhoA) and the effect of P4 on CCN1 expression will be monitored in KGN and HGrC1 cells.
  6. Investigate roles of SMAD and Hippo pathways in regulating GC function in carriers of the TRIO genotype. GCs will be collected from follicles of carriers and non-carriers of the TRIO genotype using ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration. Pathways will be activated by treatment with activators of SMAD (GDF9, BMP15) and Hippo and activation of SMADs, YAP, and TAZ will be evaluated in the two genotypes by Western blot.

Outcomes (1-6): We anticipate acquisition of in-depth of knowledge related to the specific cellular signaling pathways that regulate GC proliferation and differentiation, theca cell function, and vascular development. The interaction of these pathways defined in the in vitro and in vivo experiments will results in a fuller understanding of how follicular development is regulated in cattle and how this process can be potentially optimized.

  1. Determine role of chronic low-level LPS on ovarian function and hepatic clearance of steroid hormones. The hypothesis to be tested is that chronic exposure to LPS, due to compromised intestinal integrity or infection, alters steroid hormone production in the ovary and metabolism of steroid hormones in the liver. Jugular catheters will be surgically placed in 12 multiparous dairy cows to facilitate blood collection and LPS infusion. An infusion pump will be used to deliver chronic LPS (0.02-0.15 µg/kg/h) continuously over 24h for a 7d period. Dominant follicle diameter will be recorded daily 4 days prior to ovulation. At the time of predicted ovulation, follicular fluid will be aspirated for steroid hormone analysis (estradiol and P4). On the day of predicted ovulation, hepatic biopsies will be obtained and flash frozen for analyses of steroid hormone clearance enzymes.
  2. Investigate effects of HS on oocyte quality. Altered insulin and glucose concentrations during HS may be detrimental to the oocyte due to changes in the ultrastructure and/or Ca2+ content of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) which in turn could affect the transcriptome, proteome or epigenome. Lactating dairy cows will be subjected to four sequential treatments: thermoneutral, thermoneutral + hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp, HS and HS + euglycemic clamp. Oocytes, follicle fluid and GCs will be collected from each cow twice during each treatment. Insulin, glucose, E2, P4 will be measured in the follicular fluid.  Glucose uptake and oxidation will be measured in GCs. Gene expression and ultrastructure analysis of oocytes and GCs will be perforemd.  ER Ca2+content will be assessed using Fura-2.
  3. Determine impact of fescue on ovarian function. Consumption of endophyte-infected fescue may alter ovarian function and confer direct effects on the ovarian follicle. Cows will be fed either endophyte-infected fescue seed (KY31) or fescue seed largely devoid of endophyte for six weeks; follicular fluid will be aspirated every week for 6 weeks.  Blood samples will be collected throughout the study to evaluate circulating prolactin concentrations. The collected follicular fluid will be added to in vitro oocyte maturation media, and oocyte maturation and embryo development will be monitored. 

Outcomes (7-9): We anticipate that the findings from these experiments will enhance our understanding of the impacts of environmental stressors on ovarian function and fertility and may identify targets for amelioration strategies to improve fertility in dairy cows.  

  1. Determine which intracellular compartments contain PTGFR. CLs will be collected from synchronized dairy cows on Days 4 and 11 of the estrous cycle, representing CL that lack or have acquired luteolytic capacity. The CL will be processed for immunoelectron microscopy to visualize the intracellular location of the PTGFR. Preliminary data have been collected that validate the method and the antibody specificity, and have indicated that PTGFR is located inside luteal cells. In addition, tissues from these CL will be processed for immunohistochemistry to determine cellular location of PTGFR and quantify differences in expression and localization in Day 4 vs Day 11 CL.
  2. Delineate PGF cellular site of actions. Midcycle CL will be collected and placed into short- or long-term cultures. A PGF-biotin vs. PGF-biotin-streptavidin conjugate will be used to determine if PGF actions require its transport into luteal cells. The PGF-biotin can bind to the PTGFR at the cell membrane or diffuse into cells. However, PGF-biotin-streptavidin is unable to diffuse into the cells. Cells treated with each protein conjugate will be tested for activation of protein kinase C, mobilization of calcium, and inhibition of LH-stimulated P4.
  3. Evaluate the effect of estrogen exposure on luteal cell responses to PTGFR. Cultured luteal cells will be obtained as described above. Cells will be treated with estrogen to determine if estrogen promotes translocation of PTGFR to the nucleus of the luteal cells. Cellular localization of PTGFR will be by immunohistochemistry using the antibody that we have optimized for this work.
  4. Determine if CL rescue can be achieved by PGE production. Interferon-tau (IFNt) may rescue CL through stimulation of PGE production by the uterine endometrium. IFNt or control protein will be infused into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL. After 12 h, cows will be challenged with low doses of PGF administered directly into the uterus. Alternatively, the uterine horn will be treated with or without IFNt and with or without PGE inhibitor. Biopsies of the CL will be taken at 30 min after each PGF pulse for evaluation of mRNA expression (RNA-Seq) and physiological endpoints (e.g. immune cell infiltration).

Outcomes (10-13): We anticipate that these studies will allow understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the absence of PGF action in the early CL and the mechanisms that mediate PGF action in the mature CL. In addition, we anticipate that these studies will allow us to further understand the mechanisms involved in rescue of the CL during early pregnancy.           

Objective 2: Early embryonic wastage is a major problem in lactating cattle [53]. A major emphasis is investigating the core processes that control early embryonic development and pregnancy maintenance or loss in cattle. A central concept of this research is that there are two fundamental goals during early pregnancy; initiate, establish, and maintain a healthy pregnancy or in the absence of pregnancy, reinitiate the cyclicity at the earliest possible time. The embryo, therefore, encounters physiological gateways during pregnancy. Likewise, the uterus/dam determines if the current pregnancy continues or is eliminated. These gateways during pregnancy establishment and maintenance involve an intricate and remarkable communication between three distinct structures, the developing conceptus, the uterus, and the CL. However, there are gaps in understanding how this communication occurs.

  1. Dairy cows will be synchronized using Double-Ovsynch followed by timed AI All cows will receive GnRH (200 ug) on Day 5 after AI and only cows with a contralateral accessory CL will be used in the study. Synchronized cows with no AI will serve as non-pregnant controls. Ultrasound and blood sampling will be performed daily from d13 to d60 of pregnancy or until CL regression occurs. Day 19, 20, and 21 blood samples will be used to determine interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and circulating PGFM and PGEM. Day 22, 24, 26, and 28 samples will be used to determine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs). Continuous values (hormone concentrations, follicular/CL sizes) will be analyzed by the MIXED procedure (SAS, version 8.2, 2001). Categorical data will be evaluated by the LOGISTIC procedure (SAS, 2001). Both models will include treatment, parity, and interaction of treatment with parity.
  2. Determine potential for altered pregnancy outcome dependent on CL location. We hypothesize that an accessory CL increases fertility if located ipsilateral but reduces fertility if located contralateral to the pregnancy and/or regresses during the period of maternal recognition of pregnancy (Day 16-25). Holstein dairy cows (2,400) will be synchronized (Double-Ovsynch) and blocked by parity and randomized to receive GnRH (200 ug) or saline on Day 5 after AI. Ultrasound will be performed on day of AI (d0) and d5 to detect ovulation. Ultrasound on d12 will be used to determine ovulation and location of accessory CL. Blood samples (n = 400) will be taken on Day 12, 19, and 26 to detect P4, ISGs, and PAGs. Ultrasound will be performed on Days 19, 26, 32, 46, and 60 to determine timing of accessory CL regression and detect pregnancy. Data will be analyzed as described in #1.
  3. Determine contribution of uterine factors to early embryonic development. We hypothesize that specific uterine-derived growth factors and cytokines mediate embryo development. These factors may serve as markers for fertility and may also be used as supplements for in vitro-produced embryos. A complete evaluation of uterine fluid (UF) will be performed in synchronized cows sampled on Day 0 (at the time of AI, E2 influence), Day 10 (blastocyst in uterus, P4 influence), Day 14 (IFNt secretion, maternal recognition of pregnancy), and Day 18 (peak IFNt secretion, preimplantation period). Cows will be synchronized together and randomly assigned to two groups (bred or non-bred at Day 0). Embryo survival and mortality will be assessed using values of pregnancy specific protein B (PSPB) and flushing embryos. Comparisons will be made both in series and between the bred and non-bred groups. The sample analysis will use both gas chromatography/time-of flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF MS) and charged surface hybrid-quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CSH-QTOF MS) for analysis of metabolites.
  4. Investigate the immune system contribution to pregnancy failure. While it is clear that the early embryo alters the proportions and function of uterine resident immune cells, little is known about changes in uterine immune cells and immune mediating molecules during early pregnancy [76, 77]. We hypothesize that reduction in conception rates between heifers and mature lactating dairy cattle is due to immune dysregulation at the fetal-maternal interface. We will define the changes in immune cell proportions and expression of immune mediators during early pregnancy and compare these changes between fertile heifers and sub-fertile lactating dairy cows.
  5. Delineate how embryonic cell lineages segregate during early development. The formation of definitive epiblast (i.e. embryo/fetal), trophoblast (i.e. placental) and endoderm (i.e. yolk sac) lineages by day 8 after fertilization is crucial for embryo survival. We aim to establish the molecular systems that control the emergence of these lineages and to identify the paracrine/autocrine factors that mediate the relative proportion of each cell type in embryos.

Outcomes: We anticipate that these studies will provide substantial insight into mechanisms associated with maintenance or loss of pregnancy and regression or rescue of the CL during pivotal periods of pregnancy. In addition, we will understand the key changes in UF and uterine immune cells that are associated with early pregnancy and may improve fertility in cattle.

Objective 3: With the development of powerful molecular techniques to identify key genes involved in reproduction and genomic approaches that allow precise selection of specific genotypes, it will be possible during this project to understand and select for higher fertility in dairy cattle. We also intend to develop management strategies that maximize dairy cattle reproductive performance and farm profitability through improved P/AI and a reduction of the interbreeding interval.

  1. Investigate associations between fertility outcomes and SNP in candidate genes. We will test the hypothesis that high vs low fertility in dairy cows is associated with individual or combined SNPs in genes linked to reproductive activity. Blood samples from ~1000 lactating dairy cows are currently being obtained from multiple experiment stations for DNA genotyping that will be correlated to pregnancy/fertility phenotype information. DNA will be extracted from blood to genotype GHR, TNFα, and IGF-1 in each cow. The effects of candidate genotypes on pregnancy rates to 1st AI and through 210 days of lactation will be determined.
  2. Determine association between genomic evaluation and reproductive phenotypes. We hypothesize that there are specific genomic associations that contribute to reproductive success in cattle. The 2,400 cows in #1 will be subjected to genomic evaluation. Since all cows will be bred using the same reproductive management protocol we expect to determine SNPs that are associated with specific traits, such as circulating P4 concentrations.
  3. Increase ovulation and identify non-pregnant dairy cows earlier. First service postpartum. In commercial dairy farms, cows will receive first service TAI after synchronization of ovulation with protocols that vary in the type and dosage of hormonal treatments or interval between treatments. Ultrasound will evaluate ovulation and follicular wave dynamics after GnRH treatments. Hormone profiles (e.g., P4, E2, LH, FSH) will be used to confirm ovulation, determine luteal regression, and characterize the hormonal milieu before, during, and after synchronization of ovulation. Second and greater AI services: Ultrasound or circulating hormone concentrations will be used to assign cows to synchronization protocols based on the type and status of ovarian structures present on the ovaries. The synchronization treatment will be developed following the same premises as for first service. Pregnancy testing: Elevated concentrations of interferon stimulated genes (e.g., ISG15 and MX2) and PAG are predictive of pregnancy in cattle. These technologies will be coupled with synchronization of ovulation protocols for second and greater AI services to identify open cows earlier and reduce the inter-service interval. Circulating ISG and PAG concentrations will be used to determine timing of embryonic and fetal pregnancy losses.

Outcomes: We anticipate an overall improvement in herd reproductive performance and profitability by improving P/AI to all AI services, reducing the interbreeding interval, and reducing reproductive program costs. Given the central role of reproductive performance on the economic viability of dairy farms, optimizing timing of pregnancy in dairy cows will ensure farm profitability and sustainability.

Measurement of Progress and Results


  • Research data on signaling factors that regulate follicular activation and growth, ovulation, and oocyte quality. Data will identify novel genes, pathways, and mechanisms that affect oocyte quality, CL function, and pre-implantation embryonic development.
  • Identify maternal and paternal factors affecting fertilization and establish the role of the oviductal and uterine environment as well as inflammatory factors on successful fertilization and embryo development and implantation. Comments:
  • Information that will help producers make informed management decisions to enhance embryonic/fetal survival in ruminants.
  • Present research results at professional meetings for animal scientists, veterinarians and other agricultural related professionals. Comments:
  • Establish and characterize models that can be used for further research.

Outcomes or Projected Impacts

  • Greater understanding of mechanisms involved in reproductive physiology of livestock species.
  • New approaches to management strategies (e.g. estrous synchronization) that will enhance embryo survival and pregnancy rates.
  • Correlations between molecular phenotypes and measurable markers that can be used to develop herd management strategies that minimize the effects of nutritional/metabolic/heat stress on herd fertility.


(2017):Identify novel pathways that influence follicular growth and the quality of oocytes and luteal cells produced after the LH surge which contribute to embryo developmental competence. Measure the impact of metabolic/heat stress on these pathways

(2019):Identify genetic markers of high fertility in the dairy cow and use the basic research data collected to develop and test management protocols for producers.

(2021):Identify new markers based on understanding of ovarian function, oocyte quality and interactions in the reproductive tract that can help to maximize early embryo survival and longevity of animals in the herd. Disseminate these findings to research scientists, clinicians, and producers via extension activities (see outreach plan).

Projected Participation

View Appendix E: Participation

Outreach Plan

Disseminate Information on Reproductive Physiology and Reproductive Management Strategies to Stakeholders in the Dairy Industry

  1. Develop and Implement Workshops on Reproduction for Dairy Veterinarians in our states
  2. Develop Mechanisms to Disseminate Key Reproductive Physiology to Graduate Students at Universities


The research described herein is largely basic. Application of findings from the basic research will be conducted at experiment stations and/or cooperating farms. Results will be communicated in annual reports, in refereed publications, in presentations at national meetings and on the websites of the experiment stations involved. Data will be presented to experiment station advisory boards, and to extension personnel and commodity groups in short courses and at field days.  In addition, some extension specialists and agents will aid in collecting applied data and selecting cooperating farms. Research workers will prepare occasional news releases or participate in interviews.  Through the latter venues, stakeholder input for further work and reactions to work in progress will be obtained.  Thus, an interactive system for dissemination of results and guidance in applications will be maintained throughout the project.

Course: Several institutions will develop a team-taught, graduate course focused on exploring contemporary issues in reproductive biology. The course will be team-taught by faculty at several institutions within NE1227 using teleconference technology. This course is anticipated to provide essential training for the next generation of reproductive physiologists. Students will be taught by the experts in various reproductive biology disciplines across several institutions. Faculty exposure to students also will be increased. Several institutions within NE1227 struggle to achieve the minimum student numbers needed to offer a graduate reproductive physiology course every 1 or 2 years. Reducing teaching load and increasing teaching efficiency will provide several institutions with the opportunity to offer this course more regularly.  

The learning objectives of the course are to: 1) Compare and contrast various reproductive processes that involve the neuroendocrine control of reproduction, gametogenesis, ovarian physiology, early embryogenesis, uterine function, placental biology and fetal programming, 2) Investigate new and emerging reproductive technologies that relate to assisted reproduction and stem cell biology, and 3) Interpret primary reproductive biology literature, theorize new avenues of research that apply to this work, and construct research plans to investigate hypotheses put forth in discussions and with independent exploration that incorporate physiology, endocrinology, cell biology and molecular biology to explain reproductive processes. Participants include Iowa State (Keating), Kentucky (Bridges), Penn State (Pate), Virginia Tech (Ealy), and Wisconsin (Wiltbank).


A regional Technical Committee will be organized in accordance with the Manual for Cooperative Regional Research (CSREES-OD-1082, 1977). The voting membership of the Regional Technical Committee shall include at least one representative from each cooperating Agricultural Experiment Station as appointed by the respective Director, a technical representative of each cooperation USDA-ARS research division and other participating organizations. Non-voting members shall consist of the Administrative Advisor and a consulting member representing CSREES.

All voting members of the Technical Committee are eligible for office. A chairperson, a secretary, and a third member of the committee will be elected for 2-year terms to compose an Executive Committee. The Technical Committee will meet at least annually. The chairperson, in consultation with the administrative advisor, will notify members of the time and place of meetings. The chairperson is responsible for the preparation of the annual report of the regional project. The secretary records the minutes and other duties as assigned by the Technical Committee. The Executive Committee may be delegated to conduct the business of the Technical Committee between meetings. Other subcommittees may be named by the chairperson as required.

Literature Cited

  1. Relationship of fertility to patterns of ovarian follicular development and associated hormonal profiles in dairy cows and heifers. Cooperative Regional Research Project. J Anim Sci 1996; 74:1943-1952.
  2. Inskeep EK, Dailey RA. Maximizing Embryonic and Early Fetal Survival in Dairy Cattle. Advances in Dairy Technology, Vol 22 2010; 22:51-69.
  3. Wiltbank MC, Baez GM, Garcia-Guerra A, Toledo MZ, Monteiro PL, Melo LF, Ochoa JC, Santos JE, Sartori R. Pivotal periods for pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2016; 86:239-253.
  4. Wiltbank MC, Gumen A, Sartori R. Physiological classification of anovulatory conditions in cattle. Theriogenology 2002; 57:21-52.
  5. Hendriksen PJM, Vos P, Steenweg WNM, Bevers MM, Dieleman SJ. Bovine follicular development and its effect on the in vitro competence of oocytes. Theriogenology 2000; 53:11-20.
  6. Mermillod P, Oussaid B, Cognie Y. Aspects of follicular and oocyte maturation that affect the developmental potential of embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 1999:449-460.
  7. Sirard MA, Richard F, Blondin P, Robert C. Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality. Theriogenology 2006; 65:126-136.
  8. Buccione R, Schroeder AC, Eppig JJ. Interactions between somatic cells and germ cells throughout mammalian oogenesis. Biol Reprod 1990; 43:543-547.
  9. Matzuk MM, Burns KH, Viveiros MM, Eppig JJ. Intercellular communication in the mammalian ovary: oocytes carry the conversation. Science 2002; 296:2178-2180.
  10. Gilchrist RB, Ritter LJ, Armstrong DT. Oocyte-somatic cell interactions during follicle development in mammals. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 82-83:431-446.
  11. Ginther OJ, Kastelic JP, Knopf L. Intraovarian relationships among dominant and subordinate follicles and the corpus luteum in heifers. Theriogenology 1989; 32:787-795.
  12. Ginther OJ, Knopf L, Kastelic JP. Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 87:223-230.
  13. Sirois J, Fortune JE. Ovarian follicular dynamics during the estrous cycle in heifers monitored by real-time ultrasonography. Biol Reprod 1988; 39:308-317.
  14. Adams GP, Matteri RL, Ginther OJ. Effect of progesterone on ovarian follicles, emergence of follicular waves and circulating follicle-stimulating hormone in heifers. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96:627-640.
  15. Quirk SM, Cowan RG, Harman RM, Hu CL, Porter DA. Ovarian follicular growth and atresia: The relationship between cell proliferation and survival. J Anim Sci 2004; 82:E40-52.
  16. Aerts JM, Bols PE. Ovarian follicular dynamics. A review with emphasis on the bovine species. Part II: Antral development, exogenous influence and future prospects. Reprod Domest Anim 2010; 45:180-187.
  17. Fortune JE, Rivera GM, Yang MY. Follicular development: the role of the follicular microenvironment in selection of the dominant follicle. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 82-83:109-126.
  18. Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Bergfelt DR, Donadeu FX, Kot K. Follicle selection in monovular species. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:638-647.
  19. Webb R, Nicholas B, Gong JG, Campbell BK, Gutierrez CG, Garverick HA, Armstrong DG. Mechanisms regulating follicular development and selection of the dominant follicle. Reprod Suppl 2003; 61:71-90.
  20. Gosden R, Lee B. Portrait of an oocyte: our obscure origin. J Clin Invest 2010; 120:973-983.
  21. Ferreira EM, Vireque AA, Adona PR, Meirelles FV, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. Cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes: structural and biochemical modifications and acquisition of developmental competence. Theriogenology 2009; 71:836-848.
  22. Diaz FJ, Anderson LE, Wu YL, Rabot A, Tsai SJ, Wiltbank MC. Regulation of progesterone and prostaglandin F2alpha production in the CL. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002; 191:65-80.
  23. Strunker T, Goodwin N, Brenker C, Kashikar ND, Weyand I, Seifert R, Kaupp UB. The CatSper channel mediates progesterone-induced Ca2+ influx in human sperm. Nature 2011; 471:382-386.
  24. Lishko PV, Botchkina IL, Kirichok Y. Progesterone activates the principal Ca2+ channel of human sperm. Nature 2011; 471:387-391.
  25. Mehlmann LM. Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes: recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation. Reproduction 2005; 130:791-799.
  26. Plendl J. Angiogenesis and vascular regression in the ovary. Anat Histol Embryol 2000; 29:257-266.
  27. Geva E, Jaffe RB. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian physiology and pathology. Fert Steril 2000; 74:429-438.
  28. Robinson RS, Woad KJ, Hammond AJ, Laird M, Hunter MG, Mann GE. Angiogenesis and vascular function in the ovary. Reproduction 2009; 138:869-881.
  29. McFee RM, Cupp AS. Vascular contributions to early ovarian development: potential roles of VEGFA isoforms. Reprod Fertil Dev 2013; 25:333-342.
  30. Carvalho PD, Souza AH, Amundson MC, Hackbart KS, Fuenzalida MJ, Herlihy MM, Ayres H, Dresch AR, Vieira LM, Guenther JN, Grummer RR, Fricke PM, et al. Relationships between fertility and postpartum changes in body condition and body weight in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2014; 97:3666-3683.
  31. Luzzo KM, Wang Q, Purcell SH, Chi M, Jimenez PT, Grindler N, Schedl T, Moley KH. High fat diet induced developmental defects in the mouse: oocyte meiotic aneuploidy and fetal growth retardation/brain defects. PLoS One 2012; 7:e49217.
  32. Minge CE, Bennett BD, Norman RJ, Robker RL. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone reverses the adverse effects of diet-induced obesity on oocyte quality. Endocrinology 2008; 149:2646-2656.
  33. Pohlmeier WE, Xie F, Kurz SG, Lu N, Wood JR. Progressive obesity alters the steroidogenic response to ovulatory stimulation and increases the abundance of mRNAs stored in the ovulated oocyte. Mol Reprod Dev 2014; 81:735-747.
  34. Igosheva N, Abramov AY, Poston L, Eckert JJ, Fleming TP, Duchen MR, McConnell J. Maternal diet-induced obesity alters mitochondrial activity and redox status in mouse oocytes and zygotes. PLoS One; 5:e10074.
  35. Yang X, Wu LL, Chura LR, Liang X, Lane M, Norman RJ, Robker RL. Exposure to lipid-rich follicular fluid is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress and impaired oocyte maturation in cumulus-oocyte complexes. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:1438-1443.
  36. Wu LL, Dunning KR, Yang X, Russell DL, Lane M, Norman RJ, Robker RL. High-fat diet causes lipotoxicity responses in cumulus-oocyte complexes and decreased fertilization rates. Endocrinology 2010; 151:5438-5445.
  37. Wood JR, Dumesic DA, Abbott DH, Strauss JF, 3rd. Molecular abnormalities in oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome revealed by microarray analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:705-713.
  38. Folman Y, Rosenber.M, Herz Z, Davidson M. Relationship between plasma progesterone concentration and conception in postpart dairy cows maintained on 2 levels of nutrition Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 1973; 34:267-278.
  39. Meisterling EM, Dailey RA. Use of concentrations of progesterone and estradiol-17-beta in milk in monitoring postpartum ovarian function in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 1987; 70:2154-2161.
  40. Fonseca FA, Britt JH, Mcdaniel BT, Wilk JC, Rakes AH. Reproductive traits of Holsteins and Jerseys - Effects of age, milk yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles, detection of estrus, conception rate, and days open. Journal of Dairy Science 1983; 66:1128-1147.
  41. Souza AH, Gumen A, Silva EPB, Cunha AP, Guenther JN, Peto CM, Caraviello DZ, Wiltbank MC. Supplementation with estradiol-17 beta before the last gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection of the Ovsynch protocol in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2007; 90:4623-4634.
  42. Brusveen DJ, Cunha AP, Silva CD, Cunha PM, Sterry RA, Silva EP, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC. Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during Ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2008; 91:1044-1052.
  43. Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM, Bas S, Pawlisch RA, Guenther JN, Nascimento AB. Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2a dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response, luteal regression, and fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2013; 80:773-783.
  44. Bisinotto RS, Ribeiro ES, Martins LT, Marsola RS, Greco LF, Favoreto MG, Risco CA, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Effect of interval between induction of ovulation and artificial insemination (AI) and supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program. Journal of Dairy Science 2010; 93:5798-5808.
  45. Stronge AJH, Sreenan JM, Diskin MG, Mee JF, Kenny DA, Morris DG. Post-insemination milk progesterone concentration and embryo survival in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2005; 64:1212-1224.
  46. Wiltbank MC, Souza AH, Carvalho PD, Cunha AP, Giordano JO, Fricke PM, Baez GM, Diskin MG. Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal 2014; 8:70-81.
  47. Thatcher WW, Bartol FF, Knickerbocker JJ, Curl JS, Wolfenson D, Bazer FW, Roberts RM. Maternal recognition of pregnancy in cattle. J Dairy Sci 1984; 67:2797-2811.
  48. Silvia WJ, Fitz TA, Mayan MH, Niswender GD. Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in luteolysis and maternal recognition of pregnancy in the ewe. Animal Reproduction Science 1984; 7:57-74.
  49. Wiltbank MC, Wiepz GJ, Knickerbocker JJ, Braden TD, Sawyer HR, Mayan MH, Niswender GD. Cellular-Regulation of Corpus-Luteum Function during Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy. Reproduction Fertility and Development 1992; 4:341-347.
  50. Mamo S, Mehta JP, Forde N, McGettigan P, Lonergan P. Conceptus-Endometrium Crosstalk During Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy in Cattle. Biology of Reproduction 2012; 87.
  51. Spencer TE, Hansen TR. Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Ruminants. Regulation of Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Mammals: Tribute to 45 Year Anniversary of Roger V. Short's Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy 2015; 216:105-135.
  52. Forde N, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. 'Conceptualizing' the Endometrium: Identification of Conceptus-Derived Proteins During Early Pregnancy in Cattle. Biology of Reproduction 2015; 92.
  53. Wiltbank MC, Baez GM, Garcia-Guerra A, Toledo MZ, Monteiro PLJ, Melo LF, Ochoa JC, Santos JEP, Sartori R. Pivotal periods for pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2016; 86:239-253.
  54. Hill JR, Burghardt RC, Jones K, Long CR, Looney CR, Shin T, Spencer TE, Thompson JA, Winger QA, Westhusin ME. Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses. Biology of Reproduction 2000; 63:1787-1794.
  55. Stice SL, Strelchenko NS, Keefer CL, Matthews L. Pluripotent bovine embryonic cell lines direct embryonic development following nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction 1996; 54:100-110.
  56. Alberto MLV, Meirelles FV, Perecin F, Ambrosio CE, Favaron PO, Franciolli ALR, Mess AM, dos Santos JM, Rici REG, Bertolini M, Miglino MA. Development of bovine embryos derived from reproductive techniques. Reproduction Fertility and Development 2013; 25:907-917.
  57. De Sousa PA, King T, Harkness L, Young LE, Walker SK, Wilmut I. Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae. Biology of Reproduction 2001; 65:23-30.
  58. Thompson JG, Peterson AJ. Bovine embryo culture in vitro: new developments and post-transfer consequences. Human Reproduction 2000; 15:59-67.
  59. Maiorka PC, Favaron PO, Mess AM, dos Santos CR, Alberto ML, Meirelles FV, Miglino MA. Vascular Alterations Underlie Developmental Problems Manifested in Cloned Cattle before or after Birth. Plos One 2015; 10.
  60. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2006; 65:178-191.
  61. Chang MC. Development of bovine blastocyst with a note on implantation. The Anatomical record 1952; 113:143-161.
  62. Roberts RM, Bazer FW. The functions of uterine secretions. Journal of reproduction and fertility 1988; 82:875-892.
  63. Schultz RH, Fahning ML, Graham EF. A chemical study of uterine fluid and blood serum of normal cows during the oestrous cycle. Journal of reproduction and fertility 1971; 27:355-367.
  64. Roberts GP, Parker JM. Macromolecular components of the luminal fluid from the bovine uterus. Journal of reproduction and fertility 1974; 40:291-303.
  65. Roberts GP, Parker JM. An investigation of enzymes and hormone-binding proteins in the luminal fluid of the bovine uterus. Journal of reproduction and fertility 1974; 40:305-313.
  66. Gibbons RA, Dixon SN, Roberts GP. Uterine secretions in the cow and sheep. Biochemical Society transactions 1977; 5:452-454.
  67. Dixon SN, Gibbons RA. Proteins in the uterine secretions of the cow. Journal of reproduction and fertility 1979; 56:119-127.
  68. Segerson EC, Bazer FW. High molecular weight basic and acidic immunosuppressive protein components in uterine secretions of pregnant cows. Biology of reproduction 1989; 41:1014-1023.
  69. Leslie MV, Hansen PJ, Newton GR. Uterine secretions of the cow contain proteins that are immunochemically related to the major progesterone-induced proteins of the sheep uterus. Domestic animal endocrinology 1990; 7:517-526.
  70. Faulkner S, Elia G, Mullen MP, O'Boyle P, Dunn MJ, Morris D. A comparison of the bovine uterine and plasma proteome using iTRAQ proteomics. Proteomics 2012; 12:2014-2023.
  71. Mullen MP, Elia G, Hilliard M, Parr MH, Diskin MG, Evans AC, Crowe MA. Proteomic characterization of histotroph during the preimplantation phase of the estrous cycle in cattle. Journal of proteome research 2012; 11:3004-3018.
  72. Forde N, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, O'Hara L, Mamo S, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Proteomic analysis of uterine fluid during the pre-implantation period of pregnancy in cattle. Reproduction 2014; 147:575-587.
  73. Beltman ME, Mullen MP, Elia G, Hilliard M, Diskin MG, Evans AC, Crowe MA. Global proteomic characterization of uterine histotroph recovered from beef heifers yielding good quality and degenerate day 7 embryos. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 2014; 46:49-57.
  74. Hugentobler SA, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Sreenan JM, Morris DG. Energy substrates in bovine oviduct and uterine fluid and blood plasma during the oestrous cycle. Molecular Reproduction and Development 2008; 75:496-503.
  75. Hugentobler SA, Sreenan JM, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Diskin MG, Morris DG. Effects of changes in the concentration of systemic progesterone on ions, amino acids and energy substrates in cattle oviduct and uterine fluid and blood. Reproduction, fertility, and development 2010; 22:684-694.
  76. Ott TL, Kamat MM, Vasudevan S, Townson DH, Pate JL. Maternal immune responses to conceptus signals during early pregnancy in ruminants. Animal Reproduction 2014; 11:237-245.
  77. Kamat MM, Vasudevan S, Maalouf SA, Townson DH, Pate JL, Ott TL. Changes in Myeloid Lineage Cells in the Uterus and Peripheral Blood of Dairy Heifers During Early Pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 2016; 95.
  78. Ribeiro ES, Gomes G, Greco LF, Cerri RLA, Vieira-Neto A, Monteiro PLJ, Lima FS, Bisinotto RS, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2016; 99:2201-2220.
  79. Ribeiro ES, Lima FS, Greco LF, Bisinotto RS, Monteiro APA, Favoreto M, Ayres H, Marsola RS, Martinez N, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Prevalence of periparturient diseases and effects on fertility of seasonally calving grazing dairy cows supplemented with concentrates. Journal of Dairy Science 2013; 96:5682-5697.
  80. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Wiggans GR, Lawlor TJ. Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 2011; 94:2621-2624.
  81. Tenghe AMM, Berglund B, Wall E, Veerkamp RF, de Koning DJ. Opportunities for genomic prediction for fertility using endocrine and classical fertility traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 2016; 94:3645-3654.
  82. Cummins SB, Lonergan P, Evans ACO, Butler ST. Genetic merit for fertility traits in Holstein cows: II. Ovarian follicular and corpus luteum dynamics, reproductive hormones, and estrus behavior. Journal of Dairy Science 2012; 95:3698-3710.
  83. Moore SG, Scully S, Browne JA, Fair T, Butler ST. Genetic merit for fertility traits in Holstein cows: V. Factors affecting circulating progesterone concentrations. Journal of Dairy Science 2014; 97:5543-5557.
  84. Moore SG, Fair T, Lonergan P, Butler ST. Genetic merit for fertility traits in Holstein cows: IV. Transition period, uterine health, and resumption of cyclicity. Journal of Dairy Science 2014; 97:2740-2752.
  85. Shirasuna K, Kawashima C, Murayama C, Aoki Y, Masuda Y, Kida K, Matsui M, Shimizu T, Miyamoto A. Relationships Between the First Ovulation Postpartum and Polymorphism in Genes Relating to Function of Immunity, Metabolism and Reproduction in High-producing Dairy Cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development 2011; 57:135-142.
  86. Liefers SC, Veerkamp RF, Pas MFWT, Delavaud C, Chilliard Y, Platje M, van der Lende T. Leptin promoter mutations affect leptin levels and performance traits in dairy cows. Animal Genetics 2005; 36:111-118.
  87. Nicolini P, Carriquiry M, Meikle A. A polymorphism in the insulin-like growth factor 1 gene is associated with postpartum resumption of ovarian cyclicity in Holstein-Friesian cows under grazing conditions. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2013; 55.
  88. Waters SM, McCabe MS, Howard DJ, Giblin L, Magee DA, MacHugh DE, Berry DP. Associations between newly discovered polymorphisms in the Bos taurusgrowth hormone receptor gene and performance traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Genetics 2011; 42:39-49.
  89. Schneider A, Correa MN, Butler WR. Association between growth hormone receptor AluI polymorphism and fertility of Holstein cows. Theriogenology 2013; 80:1061-1066.
  90. Khatib H, Huang W, Wang X, Tran AH, Bindrim AB, Schutzkus V, Monson RL, Yandell BS. Single gene and gene interaction effects on fertilization and embryonic survival rates in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 2009; 92:2238-2247.
  91. Wiltbank MC, Pursley JR. The cow as an induced ovulator: timed AI after synchronization of ovulation. Theriogenology 2014; 81:170-185.
  92. Miller RH, Norman HD, Kuhn MT, Clay JS, Hutchison JL. Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding in dairy herd improvement herds. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:1594-1606.
  93. Fricke PM, Giordano JO, Valenza A, Lopes G, Jr., Amundson MC, Carvalho PD. Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows managed for first service using timed artificial insemination with or without detection of estrus using an activity-monitoring system. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:2771-2781.
  94. Giordano JO, Stangaferro ML, Wijma R, Chandler WC, Watters RD. Reproductive performance of dairy cows managed with a program aimed at increasing insemination of cows in estrus based on increased physical activity and fertility of timed artificial inseminations. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:2488-2501.
  95. Herlihy MM, Giordano JO, Souza AH, Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Keskin A, Nascimento AB, Guenther JN, Gaska JM, Kacuba SJ, Crowe MA, Butler ST, et al. Presynchronization with Double-Ovsynch improves fertility at first postpartum artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:7003-7014.
  96. Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Guenther JN, Pawlisch R, Bas S, Cunha AP, Fricke PM. Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:639-653.
  97. Souza AH, Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Wiltbank MC. A new presynchronization system (Double-Ovsynch) increases fertility at first postpartum timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2008; 70:208-215.
  98. Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM, Bas S, Pawlisch R, Guenther JN, Nascimento AB. Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2alpha dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response, luteal regression, and fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2013; 80:773-783.
  99. Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Cunha AP, Araujo RR, Wiltbank MC. Double-Ovsynch in high-producing dairy cows: effects on progesterone concentrations and ovulation to GnRH treatments. Theriogenology 2013; 79:159-164.
  100. Brusveen DJ, Souza AH, Wiltbank MC. Effects of additional prostaglandin F2alpha and estradiol-17beta during Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:1412-1422.
  101. Wijma R, Stangaferro ML, Kamat MM, Vasudevan S, Ott TL, Giordano JO. Embryo Mortality around the Period of Maintenance of the Corpus Luteum Causes Alterations to the Ovarian Function of Lactating Dairy Cows. Biology of Reproduction. 2016; (In press).
  102. Giordano JO, Fricke PM, Guenther JN, Lopes G, Jr., Herlihy MM, Nascimento AB, Wiltbank MC. Effect of progesterone on magnitude of the luteinizing hormone surge induced by two different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:3781-3793.
  103. Carvalho PD, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM. Manipulation of progesterone to increase ovulatory response to the first GnRH treatment of an Ovsynch protocol in lactating dairy cows receiving first timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:8800-8813.
  104. Giordano JO, Thomas MJ, Catucuamba G, Curler MD, Masello M, Stangaferro ML, Wijma R. Reproductive management strategies to improve the fertility of cows with a suboptimal response to resynchronization of ovulation. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:2967-2978.
  105. Wiltbank MC, Baez GM, Cochrane F, Barletta RV, Trayford CR, Joseph RT. Effect of a second treatment with prostaglandin F2alpha during the Ovsynch protocol on luteolysis and pregnancy in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:8644-8654.
  106. Doney JM, Gunn RG, Griffiths JG. The effect of premating stress on the onset of oestrus and on ovulation rate in Scottish Blackface ewes. J Reprod Fertil 1973; 35:381-384.
  107. Sejian V, Maurya VP, Naqvi SM, Kumar D, Joshi A. Effect of induced body condition score differences on physiological response, productive and reproductive performance of Malpura ewes kept in a hot, semi-arid environment. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2010; 94:154-161.
  108. Battaglia DF, Krasa HB, Padmanabhan V, Viguie C, Karsch FJ. Endocrine alterations that underlie endotoxin-induced disruption of the follicular phase in ewes. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:45-53.
  109. Saifullizam AK, Routly JE, Smith RF, Dobson H. Effect of insulin on the relationship of estrous behaviors to estradiol and LH surges in intact ewes. Physiol Behav 2010; 99:555-561.
  110. Giordano JO, Fricke PM, Cabrera VE. Economics of resynchronization strategies including chemical tests to identify nonpregnant cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96:949-961.
  111. Gifford CA, Racicot K, Clark DS, Austin KJ, Hansen TR, Lucy MC, Davies CJ, Ott TL. Regulation of interferon-stimulated genes in peripheral blood leukocytes in pregnant and bred, nonpregnant dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:274-280.
  112. Han H, Austin KJ, Rempel LA, Hansen TR. Low blood ISG15 mRNA and progesterone levels are predictive of non-pregnant dairy cows. J Endocrinol 2006; 191:505-512.
  113. Ott TL, Gifford CA. Effects of early conceptus signals on circulating immune cells: lessons from domestic ruminants. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 64:245-254.
  114. Giordano JO, Guenther JN, Lopes G, Jr., Fricke PM. Changes in serum pregnancy-associated glycoprotein, pregnancy-specific protein B, and progesterone concentrations before and after induction of pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:683-697.
  115. Silva E, Sterry RA, Kolb D, Mathialagan N, McGrath MF, Ballam JM, Fricke PM. Accuracy of a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA to determine pregnancy status of lactating dairy cows twenty-seven days after timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:4612-4622.
  116. Mercadante PM, Ribeiro ES, Risco C, Ealy AD. Associations between pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and pregnancy outcomes, milk yield, parity, and clinical diseases in high-producing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:3031-3040.
  117. Pohler KG, Pereira MH, Lopes FR, Lawrence JC, Keisler DH, Smith MF, Vasconcelos JL, Green JA. Circulating concentrations of bovine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and late embryonic mortality in lactating dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:1584-1594.
  118. Kaipia A, Hsueh AJW. Regulation of ovarian follicle atresia. Annu Rev Physiol 1997; 59:349-363.
  119. Tilly JL. The molecular basis of ovarian cell death during germ cell attrition, follicular atresia, and luteolysis. Front Biosci 1996; 1:d1-d11.
  120. D'Haeseleer M, Cocquyt G, Van Cruchten S, Simoens P, Van den Broeck W. Cell-specific localisation of apoptosis in the bovine ovary at different stages of the oestrous cycle. Theriogenology 2006; 65:757-772.
  121. Lin P, Rui R. Effects of follicular size and FSH on granulosa cell apoptosis and atresia in porcine antral follicles. Mol Reprod Dev 2010; 77:670-678.
  122. Manabe N, Matsuda-Minehata F, Goto Y, Maeda A, Cheng Y, Nakagawa S, Inoue N, Wongpanit K, Jin H, Gonda H, Li J. Role of cell death ligand and receptor system on regulation of follicular atresia in pig ovaries. Reprod Domest Anim 2008; 43 Suppl 2:268-272.
  123. Hsueh AJ, Billig H, Tsafriri A. Ovarian follicle atresia: a hormonally controlled apoptotic process. Endocr Rev 1994; 15:707-724.
  124. Hakuno N, Koji T, Yano T, Kobayashi N, Tsutsumi O, Taketani Y, Nakane PK. Fas/APO-1/CD95 system as a mediator of granulosa cell apoptosis in ovarian follicle atresia. Endocrinology 1996; 137:1938-1948.
  125. Kim JM, Boone DL, Auyeung A, Tsang BK. Granulosa cell apoptosis induced at the penultimate stage of follicular development is associated with increased levels of Fas and Fas ligand in the rat ovary. Biol. Reprod. 1998; 58:1170-1176.
  126. Kondo H, Maruo T, Peng X, Mochizuki M. Immunological evidence for the expression of the Fas antigen in the infant and adult human ovary during follicular regression and atresia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1996; 81:2702-2710.
  127. Porter DA, Vickers SL, Cowan RG, Huber SC, Quirk SM. Expression and function of Fas antigen vary in bovine granulosa and theca cells during ovarian follicular development and atresia. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:62-66.
  128. Palumbo A, Yeh J. In situ localization of apoptosis in the rat ovary during follicular atresia. Biol. Reprod. 1994; 51:888-895.
  129. Logothetopoulos J, Dorrington J, Bailey D, Stratis M. Dynamics of follicular growth and atresia of large follicles during the ovarian cycle of the guinea pig: fate of the degenerating follicles, a quantitative study. Anat Rec 1995; 243:37-48.
  130. Porter DA, Harman RM, Cowan RG, Quirk SM. Susceptibility of ovarian granulosa cells to apoptosis differs in cells isolated before or after the preovulatory LH surge. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001; 176:13-20.
  131. Hu YC, Wang PH, Yeh S, Wang RS, Xie C, Xu Q, Zhou X, Chao HT, Tsai MY, Chang C. Subfertility and defective folliculogenesis in female mice lacking androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:11209-11214.
  132. Quirk SM, Cowan RG, Harman RM. The susceptibility of granulosa cells to apoptosis is influenced by oestradiol and the cell cycle. J Endocrinol 2006; 189:441-453.
  133. Austin EJ, Mihm M, Evans AC, Knight PG, Ireland JL, Ireland JJ, Roche JF. Alterations in intrafollicular regulatory factors and apoptosis during selection of follicles in the first follicular wave of the bovine estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:839-848.
  134. Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Kot K, Meira C, Bergfelt DR. Associated and independent comparisons between the two largest follicles preceding follicle deviation in cattle. Biol Reprod 2003; 68:524-529.
  135. Mihm M, Austin EJ, Good TE, Ireland JL, Knight PG, Roche JF, Ireland JJ. Identification of potential intrafollicular factors involved in selection of dominant follicles in heifers. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:811-819.
  136. Irving-Rodgers HF, van Wezel IL, Mussard ML, Kinder JE, Rodgers RJ. Atresia revisited: two basic patterns of atresia of bovine antral follicles. Reproduction 2001; 122:761-775.
  137. Rodgers RJ, Irving-Rodgers HF. Morphological classification of bovine ovarian follicles. Reproduction 2010; 139:309-318.
  138. Ryan KE, Casey SM, Canty MJ, Crowe MA, Martin F, Evans AC. Akt and Erk signal transduction pathways are early markers of differentiation in dominant and subordinate ovarian follicles in cattle. Reproduction 2007; 133:617-626.
  139. Sen A, Lv L, Bello N, Ireland JJ, Smith GW. Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript accelerates termination of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced extracellularly regulated kinase 1/2 and Akt activation by regulating the expression and degradation of specific mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatases in bovine granulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol 2008; 22:2655-2676.
  140. Hu CL, Cowan RG, Harman RM, Quirk SM. Cell cycle progression and activation of Akt kinase are required for insulin-like growth factor I-mediated suppression of apoptosis in granulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol 2004; 18:326-338.
  141. Johnson AL, Bridgham JT, Swenson JA. Activation of the Akt/protein kinase B signaling pathway is associated with granulosa cell survival. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1566-1574.
  142. Woods DC, Johnson AL. Regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone-receptor messenger RNA in hen granulosa cells relative to follicle selection. Biol Reprod 2005; 72:643-650.
  143. Woods DC, Johnson AL. Phosphatase activation by epidermal growth factor family ligands regulates extracellular regulated kinase signaling in undifferentiated hen granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2006; 147:4931-4940.
  144. Ebisuya M, Kondoh K, Nishida E. The duration, magnitude and compartmentalization of ERK MAP kinase activity: mechanisms for providing signaling specificity. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:2997-3002.
  145. Chan SW, Lim CJ, Chen L, Chong YF, Huang C, Song H, Hong W. The hippo pathway in biological control and cancer development. Journal of Cellular Physiology 2011; 226:928-939.
  146. Pisarska MD, Kuo FT, Bentsi-Barnes IK, Khan S, Barlow GM. LATS1 phosphorylates forkhead L2 and regulates its transcriptional activity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 299:E101-109.
  147. Ozawa M, Hansen PJ. A novel method for purification of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells from blastocysts using magnetic activated cell sorting. Fertility and Sterility 2011; 95:799-802.
  148. Hong W, Guan K-L. The YAP and TAZ transcription co-activators: Key downstream effectors of the mammalian Hippo pathway. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 2012; 23:785-793.
  149. Oka T, Mazack V, Sudol M. Mst2 and Lats Kinases Regulate Apoptotic Function of Yes Kinase-associated Protein (YAP). Journal of Biological Chemistry 2008; 283:27534-27546.
  150. Musah S, Wrighton PJ, Zaltsman Y, Zhong X, Zorn S, Parlato MB, Hsiao C, Palecek SP, Chang Q, Murphy WL, Kiessling LL. Substratum-induced differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells reveals the coactivator YAP is a potent regulator of neuronal specification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014; 111:13805-13810.
  151. Asaoka Y, Hata S, Namae M, Furutani-Seiki M, Nishina H. The Hippo Pathway Controls a Switch between Retinal Progenitor Cell Proliferation and Photoreceptor Cell Differentiation in Zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2014; 9:e97365.
  152. Zhang H, Deo M, Thompson RC, Uhler MD, Turner DL. Negative regulation of Yap during neuronal differentiation. Developmental Biology 2012; 361:103-115.
  153. St John MAR, Tao W, Fei X, Fukumoto R, Carcangiu ML, Brownstein DG, Parlow AF, McGrath J, Xu T. Mice deficient of Lats1 develop soft-tissue sarcomas, ovarian tumours and pituitary dysfunction. Nat Genet 1999; 21:182-186.
  154. Sun T, Pepling ME, Diaz FJ. Lats1 Deletion Causes Increased Germ Cell Apoptosis and Follicular Cysts in Mouse Ovaries. Biology of Reproduction 2015; 93:22, 21-11.
  155. Sedelis M, Hofele K, Auburger GW, Morgan S, Huston JP, Schwarting RK. MPTP susceptibility in the mouse: behavioral, neurochemical, and histological analysis of gender and strain differences. Behav Genet 2000; 30:171-182.
  156. Cheng Y, Feng Y, Jansson L, Sato Y, Deguchi M, Kawamura K, Hsueh AJ. Actin polymerization-enhancing drugs promote ovarian follicle growth mediated by the Hippo signaling effector YAP. The FASEB Journal 2015; 29:2423-2430.
  157. Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, Ho C-h, Kawamura N, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, Sugishita Y, Morimoto Y, et al. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013; 110:17474-17479.
  158. Li Q. Inhibitory SMADs: Potential Regulators of Ovarian Function. Biology of Reproduction 2015; 92:50, 51-56.
  159. Mulsant P, Lecerf F, Fabre S, Schibler L, Monget P, Lanneluc I, Pisselet C, Riquet J, Monniaux D, Callebaut I, Cribiu E, Thimonier J, et al. Mutation in bone morphogenetic protein receptor-IB is associated with increased ovulation rate in Booroola Merino ewes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:5104-5109.
  160. Galloway SM, McNatty KP, Cambridge LM, Laitinen MP, Juengel JL, Jokiranta TS, McLaren RJ, Luiro K, Dodds KG, Montgomery GW, Beattie AE, Davis GH, et al. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nat Genet 2000; 25:279-283.
  161. Souza CJ, MacDougall C, Campbell BK, McNeilly AS, Baird DT. The Booroola (FecB) phenotype is associated with a mutation in the bone morphogenetic receptor type 1 B (BMPR1B) gene. J Endocrinol 2001; 169:R1-6.
  162. Wilson T, Wu XY, Juengel JL, Ross IK, Lumsden JM, Lord EA, Dodds KG, Walling GA, McEwan JC, O'Connell AR, McNatty KP, Montgomery GW. Highly prolific Booroola sheep have a mutation in the intracellular kinase domain of bone morphogenetic protein IB receptor (ALK-6) that is expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1225-1235.
  163. Hanrahan JP, Gregan SM, Mulsant P, Mullen M, Davis GH, Powell R, Galloway SM. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries). Biol Reprod 2004; 70:900-909.
  164. Gong X, McGee EA. Smad3 is required for normal follicular follicle-stimulating hormone responsiveness in the mouse. Biol Reprod 2009; 81:730-738.
  165. Moore RK, Shimasaki S. Molecular biology and physiological role of the oocyte factor, BMP-15. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2005; 234:67-73.
  166. Richards JS, Pangas SA. The ovary: basic biology and clinical implications. J Clin Invest 2010; 120:963-972.
  167. Shi FT, Cheung AP, Leung PC. Growth differentiation factor 9 enhances activin a-induced inhibin B production in human granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2009; 150:3540-3546.
  168. Shimizu T, Jayawardana BC, Nishimoto H, Kaneko E, Tetsuka M, Miyamoto A. Involvement of the bone morphogenetic protein/receptor system during follicle development in the bovine ovary: Hormonal regulation of the expression of bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7) and its receptors (ActRII and ALK-2). Mol Cell Endocrinol 2006; 249:78-83.
  169. Souza CJ, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Campbell BK, McNeilly AS, Baird DT. Mechanisms of action of the principal prolific genes and their application to sheep production. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16:395-401.
  170. Spicer LJ, Aad PY, Allen D, Mazerbourg S, Hsueh AJ. Growth differentiation factor-9 has divergent effects on proliferation and steroidogenesis of bovine granulosa cells. J Endocrinol 2006; 189:329-339.
  171. Spicer LJ, Aad PY, Allen DT, Mazerbourg S, Payne AH, Hsueh AJ. Growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) stimulates proliferation and inhibits steroidogenesis by bovine theca cells: influence of follicle size on responses to GDF9. Biol Reprod 2008; 78:243-253.
  172. Tian X, Halfhill AN, Diaz FJ. Localization of phosphorylated SMAD proteins in granulosa cells, oocytes and oviduct of female mice. Gene Expr Patterns 2010; 10:105-112.
  173. Tomic D, Brodie SG, Deng C, Hickey RJ, Babus JK, Malkas LH, Flaws JA. Smad 3 may regulate follicular growth in the mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:917-923.
  174. Xu J, Oakley J, McGee EA. Stage-specific expression of Smad2 and Smad3 during folliculogenesis. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:1571-1578.
  175. Juengel JL, Davis GH, McNatty KP. Using sheep lines with mutations in single genes to better understand ovarian function. Reproduction 2013; 146:R111-R123.
  176. Kirkpatrick BW, Morris CA. A Major Gene for Bovine Ovulation Rate. Plos One 2015; 10.
  177. Varelas X, Sakuma R, Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Peerani R, Rao BM, Dembowy J, Yaffe MB, Zandstra PW, Wrana JL. TAZ controls Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and regulates human embryonic stem-cell self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:837-848.
  178. Sango K, Yamanaka S, Hoffmann A, Okuda Y, Grinberg A, Westphal H, McDonald MP, Crawley JN, Sandhoff K, Suzuki K, Proia RL. Mouse models of Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases differ in neurologic phenotype and ganglioside metabolism. Nat Genet 1995; 11:170-176.
  179. Barrios-Rodiles M, Brown KR, Ozdamar B, Bose R, Liu Z, Donovan RS, Shinjo F, Liu Y, Dembowy J, Taylor IW, Luga V, Przulj N, et al. High-Throughput Mapping of a Dynamic Signaling Network in Mammalian Cells. Science 2005; 307:1621-1625.
  180. Alarcan C, Zaromytidou A-I, Xi Q, Gao S, Yu J, Fujisawa S, Barlas A, Miller AN, Manova-Todorova K, Macias MJ, Sapkota G, Pan D, et al. Nuclear CDKs Drive Smad Transcriptional Activation and Turnover in BMP and TGF-β Pathways. Cell 2009; 139:757-769.
  181. Varelas X, Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Narimatsu M, Weiss A, Cockburn K, Larsen BG, Rossant J, Wrana JL. The Crumbs Complex Couples Cell Density Sensing to Hippo-Dependent Control of the TGF-beta-SMAD Pathway. Developmental Cell 2010; 19:831-844.
  182. Astorga J, Carlsson P. Hedgehog induction of murine vasculogenesis is mediated by Foxf1 and Bmp4. Development 2007; 134:3753-3761.
  183. Byrd N, Grabel L. Hedgehog signaling in murine vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2004; 14:308-313.
  184. Dyer MA, Farrington SM, Mohn D, Munday JR, Baron MH. Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo. Development 2001; 128:1717-1730.
  185. Swift MR, Weinstein BM. Arterial-venous specification during development. Circ Res 2009; 104:576-588.
  186. Vokes SA, Yatskievych TA, Heimark RL, McMahon J, McMahon AP, Antin PB, Krieg PA. Hedgehog signaling is essential for endothelial tube formation during vasculogenesis. Development 2004; 131:4371-4380.
  187. Ren Y, Cowan RG, Harman RM, Quirk SM. Dominant activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway in the ovary alters theca development and prevents ovulation. Mol Endocrinol 2009; 23:711-723.
  188. Ren Y, Cowan RG, Migone FF, Quirk SM. Overactivation of hedgehog signaling alters development of the ovarian vasculature in mice. Biol Reprod 2012; 86:174.
  189. Russell MC, Cowan RG, Harman RM, Walker AL, Quirk SM. The hedgehog signaling pathway in the mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 2007; 77:226-236.
  190. Spicer LJ, Sudo S, Aad PY, Wang LS, Chun SY, Ben-Shlomo I, Klein C, Hsueh AJW. The hedgehog-patched signaling pathway and function in the mammalian ovary: a novel role for hedgehog proteins in stimulating proliferation and steroidogenesis of theca cells. Reproduction 2009; 138:329-339.
  191. Wijgerde M, Ooms M, Hoogerbrugge JW, Grootegoed JA. Hedgehog signaling in mouse ovary: Indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog induce target gene expression in developing theca cells. Endocrinology 2005; 146:3558-3566.
  192. Liu C, Peng J, Matzuk MM, Yao HH. Lineage specification of ovarian theca cells requires multicellular interactions via oocyte and granulosa cells. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6934.
  193. Goede V, Schmidt T, Kimmina S, Kozian D, Augustin HG. Analysis of blood vessel maturation processes during cyclic ovarian angiogenesis. Lab Invest 1998; 78:1385-1394.
  194. Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand Sj, Radziejewski C, Compton D, McClain J, Thomas JD, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD. Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science 1997; 277:55-60.
  195. Shimizu T, Berisha B, Schams D, Miyamoto A. Expression of angiopoietin (ANPT)-1, ANPT-2 and their receptors in dominant follicles during periovulatory period in GnRH-treated cow. Reprod Domest Anim 2007; 42:221-224.
  196. Matsuoka-Sakata A, Tamura H, Asada H, Miwa I, Taketani T, Yamagata Y, Sugino N. Changes in vascular leakage and expression of angiopoietins in the corpus luteum during pregnancy in rats. Reproduction 2006; 131:351-360.
  197. Perbal B. CCN proteins: multifunctional signalling regulators. Lancet 2004; 363:62-64.
  198. Lau LF. CCN1/CYR61: the very model of a modern matricellular protein. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 68:3149-3163.
  199. Zhang B, Tsang PC, Pate JL, Moses MA. A role for cysteine-rich 61 in the angiogenic switch during the estrous cycle in cows: regulation by prostaglandin F2alpha. Biol Reprod 2011; 85:261-268.
  200. Tsang PCW, Coticchia CM, Gaspar J, Elder D, Moses MA. In vivo expression of cysteine-rich 61 and angiogenic regulators in bovine ovarian follicles. Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction 2011.
  201. Tsang PCW, Coticchia CM, Miseirvitch J, Clark J, Davis JS, Moses MA. Are CCN1 (Cysteine Rich 61-Connective Tissue Growth Factor-Nephroblastoma Overexpressed) and integrin receptor subunits expressed by KGN, an ovarian granulosa tumor cell line? Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction 2012.
  202. Berisha B, Schams D, Kosmann M, Amselgruber W, Einspanier R. Expression and localisation of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor during the final growth of bovine ovarian follicles. J Endocrinol 2000; 167:371-382.
  203. Schams D, Kosmann M, Berisha B, Amselgruber WM, Miyamoto A. Stimulatory and synergistic effects of luteinising hormone and insulin like growth factor 1 on the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and progesterone of cultured bovine granulosa cells. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2001; 109:155-162.
  204. Bakke LJ, Dow MP, Cassar CA, Peters MW, Pursley JR, Smith GW. Effect of the preovulatory gonadotropin surge on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14, MMP-2, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 expression within bovine periovulatory follicular and luteal tissue. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:1627-1634.
  205. Imai K, Khandoker MA, Yonai M, Takahashi T, Sato T, Ito A, Hasegawa Y, Hashizume K. Matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 activities in bovine follicular fluid of different-sized follicles: relationship to intra-follicular inhibin and steroid concentrations. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2003; 24:171-183.
  206. Smith MF, Gutierrez CG, Ricke WA, Armstrong DG, Webb R. Production of matrix metalloproteinases by cultured bovine theca and granulosa cells. Reproduction 2005; 129:75-87.
  207. Grazul-Bilska AT, Navanukraw C, Johnson ML, Vonnahme KA, Ford SP, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Vascularity and expression of angiogenic factors in bovine dominant follicles of the first follicular wave. J Anim Sci 2007; 85:1914-1922.
  208. Doyle LK, Walker CA, Donadeu FX. VEGF modulates the effects of gonadotropins in granulosa cells. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010; 38:127-137.
  209. Nishi Y, Yanase T, Mu Y, Oba K, Ichino I, Saito M, Nomura M, Mukasa C, Okabe T, Goto K, Takayanagi R, Kashimura Y, et al. Establishment and characterization of a steroidogenic human granulosa-like tumor cell line, KGN, that expresses functional follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. Endocrinology 2001; 142:437-445.
  210. Bayasula, Iwase A, Kiyono T, Takikawa S, Goto M, Nakamura T, Nagatomo Y, Nakahara T, Kotani T, Kobayashi H, Kondo M, Manabe S, et al. Establishment of a human nonluteinized granulosa cell line that transitions from the gonadotropin-independent to the gonadotropin-dependent status. Endocrinology 2012; 153:2851-2860.
  211. Fortune JE, Willis EL, Bridges PJ, Yang CS. The periovulatory period in cattle: progesterone, prostaglandins, oxytocin and ADAMTS proteases. Anim Reprod 2009; 6:60-71.
  212. Udagawa O, Ishihara T, Maeda M, Matsunaga Y, Tsukamoto S, Kawano N, Miyado K, Shitara H, Yokota S, Nomura M, Mihara K, Mizushima N, et al. Mitochondrial fission factor Drp1 maintains oocyte quality via dynamic rearrangement of multiple organelles. Curr Biol 2014; 24:2451-2458.
  213. Paredes RM, Bollo M, Holstein D, Lechleiter JD. Luminal Ca2+ depletion during the unfolded protein response in Xenopus oocytes: cause and consequence. Cell Calcium 2013; 53:286-296.
  214. Wu LL, Russell DL, Wong SL, Chen M, Tsai TS, St John JC, Norman RJ, Febbraio MA, Carroll J, Robker RL. Mitochondrial dysfunction in oocytes of obese mothers: transmission to offspring and reversal by pharmacological endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibitors. Development 2015; 142:681-691.
  215. Baumgard LH, Rhoads RP, Jr. Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2013; 1:311-337.
  216. Rollwagen FM, Madhavan S, Singh A, Li YY, Wolcott K, Maheshwari R. IL-6 protects enterocytes from hypoxia-induced apoptosis by induction of bcl-2 mRNA and reduction of fas mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 347:1094-1098.
  217. Amar J, Burcelin R, Ruidavets JB, Cani PD, Fauvel J, Alessi MC, Chamontin B, Ferrieres J. Energy intake is associated with endotoxemia in apparently healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87:1219-1223.
  218. Al-Attas OS, Al-Daghri NM, Al-Rubeaan K, da Silva NF, Sabico SL, Kumar S, McTernan PG, Harte AL. Changes in endotoxin levels in T2DM subjects on anti-diabetic therapies. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009; 8:20.
  219. Hawkesworth S, Moore SE, Fulford AJ, Barclay GR, Darboe AA, Mark H, Nyan OA, Prentice AM. Evidence for metabolic endotoxemia in obese and diabetic Gambian women. Nutr Diabetes 2013; 3:e83.
  220. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009; 457:480-484.
  221. Backhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, Semenkovich CF, Gordon JI. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:15718-15723.
  222. Hamilton MK, Boudry G, Lemay DG, Raybould HE. Changes in intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota in high-fat diet-fed rats are dynamic and region dependent. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2015; 308:G840-851.
  223. Ding S, Chi MM, Scull BP, Rigby R, Schwerbrock NM, Magness S, Jobin C, Lund PK. High-fat diet: bacteria interactions promote intestinal inflammation which precedes and correlates with obesity and insulin resistance in mouse. PLoS One 2010; 5:e12191.
  224. Cani PD, Amar J, Iglesias MA, Poggi M, Knauf C, Bastelica D, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, Tuohy KM, Chabo C, Waget A, Delmee E, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 2007; 56:1761-1772.
  225. Kim KA, Gu W, Lee IA, Joh EH, Kim DH. High fat diet-induced gut microbiota exacerbates inflammation and obesity in mice via the TLR4 signaling pathway. PLoS One 2012; 7:e47713.
  226. Cani PD, Osto M, Geurts L, Everard A. Involvement of gut microbiota in the development of low-grade inflammation and type 2 diabetes associated with obesity. Gut Microbes 2012; 3:279-288.
  227. Moreno-Indias I, Cardona F, Tinahones FJ, Queipo-Ortuno MI. Impact of the gut microbiota on the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Microbiol 2014; 5:190.
  228. Guinane CM, Cotter PD. Role of the gut microbiota in health and chronic gastrointestinal disease: understanding a hidden metabolic organ. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2013; 6:295-308.
  229. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Interactions between gut microbiota and host metabolism predisposing to obesity and diabetes. Annu Rev Med 2011; 62:361-380.
  230. Cho I, Blaser MJ. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:260-270.
  231. Gracida X, Eckmann CR. Fertility and germline stem cell maintenance under different diets requires nhr-114/HNF4 in C. elegans. Curr Biol 2013; 23:607-613.
  232. Gracida X, Eckmann CR. Mind the gut: Dietary impact on germline stem cells and fertility. Commun Integr Biol 2013; 6:e26004.
  233. Xie F, Anderson CL, Timme KR, Kurz SG, Fernando SC, Wood JR. Obesity-Dependent Increases in Oocyte mRNAs Are Associated With Increases in Proinflammatory Signaling and Gut Microbial Abundance of Lachnospiraceae in Female Mice. Endocrinology 2016; 157:1630-1643.
  234. Bromfield JJ, Sheldon IM. Lipopolysaccharide reduces the primordial follicle pool in the bovine ovarian cortex ex vivo and in the murine ovary in vivo. Biol Reprod 2013; 88:98.
  235. Herman AP, Romanowicz K, Tomaszewska-Zaremba D. Effect of LPS on reproductive system at the level of the pituitary of anestrous ewes. Reprod Domest Anim 2010; 45:e351-359.
  236. Williams EJ, Sibley K, Miller AN, Lane EA, Fishwick J, Nash DM, Herath S, England GC, Dobson H, Sheldon IM. The effect of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide and tumour necrosis factor alpha on ovarian function. Am J Reprod Immunol 2008; 60:462-473.
  237. Price JC, Bromfield JJ, Sheldon IM. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns initiate inflammation and perturb the endocrine function of bovine granulosa cells from ovarian dominant follicles via TLR2 and TLR4 pathways. Endocrinology 2013; 154:3377-3386.
  238. Herath S, Williams EJ, Lilly ST, Gilbert RO, Dobson H, Bryant CE, Sheldon IM. Ovarian follicular cells have innate immune capabilities that modulate their endocrine function. Reproduction 2007; 134:683-693.
  239. Peter AT, Bosu WT, Liptrap RM, Cummings E. Temporal changes in serum prostaglandin F2alpha and oxytocin in dairy cows with short luteal phases after the first postpartum ovulation. Theriogenology 1989; 32:277-284.
  240. Peter AT, Bosu WT, DeDecker RJ. Suppression of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges in heifers after intrauterine infusions of Escherichia coli endotoxin. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50:368-373.
  241. Fergani C, Saifullizam AK, Routly JE, Smith RF, Dobson H. Estrous behavior, luteinizing hormone and estradiol profiles of intact ewes treated with insulin or endotoxin. Physiol Behav 2012; 105:757-765.
  242. Moresco EM, LaVine D, Beutler B. Toll-like receptors. Curr Biol 2011; 21:R488-493.
  243. Piya MK, McTernan PG, Kumar S. Adipokine inflammation and insulin resistance: the role of glucose, lipids and endotoxin. J Endocrinol 2013; 216:T1-T15.
  244. Imada K, Leonard WJ. The Jak-STAT pathway. Mol Immunol 2000; 37:1-11.
  245. Oeckinghaus A, Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Crosstalk in NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Nat Immunol 2011; 12:695-708.
  246. Grivennikov SI, Karin M. Dangerous liaisons: STAT3 and NF-kappaB collaboration and crosstalk in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2010; 21:11-19.
  247. Wu R, Van der Hoek KH, Ryan NK, Norman RJ, Robker RL. Macrophage contributions to ovarian function. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10:119-133.
  248. Nteeba J, Ganesan S, Keating AF. Progressive obesity alters ovarian folliculogenesis with impacts on pro-inflammatory and steroidogenic signaling in female mice. Biol Reprod 2014; 91:86.
  249. Robker RL, Wu LL, Yang X. Inflammatory pathways linking obesity and ovarian dysfunction. J Reprod Immunol 2011; 88:142-148.
  250. Murphy K, Carvajal L, Medico L, Pepling M. Expression of Stat3 in germ cells of developing and adult mouse ovaries and testes. Gene Expr Patterns 2005; 5:475-482.
  251. Tao S, Bubolz JW, do Amaral BC, Thompson IM, Hayen MJ, Johnson SE, Dahl GE. Effect of heat stress during the dry period on mammary gland development. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94:5976-5986.
  252. Tao S, Monteiro AP, Hayen MJ, Dahl GE. Short communication: Maternal heat stress during the dry period alters postnatal whole-body insulin response of calves. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:897-901.
  253. Brown BM, Stallings JW, Clay JS, Rhoads ML. Periconceptional Heat Stress of Holstein Dams Is Associated with Differences in Daughter Milk Production and Composition during Multiple Lactations. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0133574.
  254. Brown BM, Stallings JW, Clay JS, Rhoads ML. Periconceptional Heat Stress of Holstein Dams Is Associated with Differences in Daughter Milk Production during Their First Lactation. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0148234.
  255. Nascimento AB, Souza AH, Keskin A, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Lack of complete regression of the Day 5 corpus luteum after one or two doses of PGF(2 alpha) in nonlactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology 2014; 81:389-395.
  256. Bowdridge EC, Goravanahally MP, Inskeep EK, Flores JA. Activation of Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase Is an Additional Mechanism That Participates in Mediating Inhibitory Actions of Prostaglandin F-2Alpha in Mature, but Not Developing, Bovine Corpora Lutea. Biology of Reproduction 2015; 93.
  257. Wiltbank MC, Shiao TF, Bergfelt DR, Ginther OJ. Prostaglandin-F2-Alpha Receptors in the Early Bovine Corpus-Luteum. Biology of Reproduction 1995; 52:74-78.
  258. Kim SO, Markosyan N, Pepe GJ, Duffy DM. Estrogen promotes luteolysis by redistributing prostaglandin F2 alpha receptors within primate luteal cells. Reproduction 2015; 149:453-464.
  259. Gengenbach DR, Hixon JE, Hansel W. Luteolytic Interaction between Estradiol and Prostaglandin-F2 Alpha in Hysterectomized Ewes. Biology of Reproduction 1977; 16:571-579.
  260. Baez GM, Barletta RV, Guenther JG, Gaska JM, Wiltbank MC. Effect of uterine size on fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2015; 84:1016-1024.
  261. Bello NM, Steibel JP, Pursley JR. Optimizing ovulation to first GnRH improved outcomes to each hormonal injection of ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:3413-3424.
  262. Carvalho PD, Fuenzalida MJ, Ricci A, Souza AH, Barletta RV, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM. Modifications to Ovsynch improve fertility during resynchronization: Evaluation of presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone 6 d before initiation of Ovsynch and addition of a second prostaglandin F2alpha treatment. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:8741-8752.
  263. Nascimento AB, Bender RW, Souza AH, Ayres H, Araujo RR, Guenther JN, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Effect of treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin on day 5 after timed artificial insemination on fertility of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96:2873-2882.
  264. Bisinotto RS, Castro LO, Pansani MB, Narciso CD, Martinez N, Sinedino LD, Pinto TL, Van de Burgwal NS, Bosman HM, Surjus RS, Thatcher WW, Santos JE. Progesterone supplementation to lactating dairy cows without a corpus luteum at initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:2515-2528.
  265. Stevenson JS, Pursley JR, Garverick HA, Fricke PM, Kesler DJ, Ottobre JS, Wiltbank MC. Treatment of cycling and noncycling lactating dairy cows with progesterone during Ovsynch. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:2567-2578.


Land Grant Participating States/Institutions


Non Land Grant Participating States/Institutions

Log Out ?

Are you sure you want to log out?

Press No if you want to continue work. Press Yes to logout current user.

Report a Bug
Report a Bug

Describe your bug clearly, including the steps you used to create it.